摘要
个人信息人格权益的完整保护路径为:对于隐私利益,由侵权责任制度提供法律保护;对于自决利益,信息主体可通过行使自决权在“数据隐私”与“数字便利”间做出选择,适用违约责任法律模式。相对于人格权利益,个人信息的财产价值主要由数据生产者实现,而如何界定非个人数据决定了个人处分权能的行使空间与数据财产权益的归属。目前立法关于“关联性”与“识别性”的定性实则采取了技术标准,因此被合规化处理的个人数据所衍生的经济利益属于数据生产者,排斥信息主体的直接权益主张。
The protection approach of personality rights enshrined in personal information is as follows:as of privacy interests,legal protection is supported by tort liability system;Regarding self-determination interest,information subject can balance their interests between"data privacy"and"digital convenience"by exercising the self-determination right,which is regulated by liability system for breach of contract.Compared with personality right,the economic value of personal information is mainly realized by the data producer.Thereof,how non-personal data is defined determines the application of individuals'disposition right and the ownership of data property.In fact,the existing legislation adopts technical standards for the qualitative definition of"relevance"and"identification".Therefore,the economic benefits derived from the personal information processed in compliance belong to the data producer,excluding information subject's direct claim on rights and interests.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期71-85,共15页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(17CFX022)。
关键词
数据隐私
信息自决
处分协议
非个人数据
data privacy
power of information disposition
disposition terms
non-personal data
