期刊文献+

汉代谶纬界对“河图”“洛书”概念的重整——兼论“汉无河图”通说中《河图赤伏符》的官方定位

Conceptual Reorganization of“Hetu”and“Luoshu”by the Chenwei Realm in the Han Dynasty——With Concurrent Focus on the Official Positioning of Hetu Chifu Fu in the Popularly Accepted“Non-Existence of Hetu in Han”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 汉代谶纬语境中的所谓“河图”“洛书”,均有古今之分、“本文”与“演文”之分,其中,“演文”中又有正文与解辞之分。因此在“河图篇目,已甚繁复”的时代语境下,在《河图赤伏符》官方意识形态的笼罩下,仍不妨碍汉代时儒有着“方今无河图”的公论,因为《河图赤伏符》实被划归为“为汉赤制”的孔圣所增演转述之作。“洛书”更值得关注的是在“图”“书”并出、“河”“洛”并言的配对关系中作为迁就方的被动性。“洛水所出丹书”与“黄河录图之书”被理解为“洛书”的一体两面,前者尚属对等,后者已见主次,遑论降格的“假驱”之说。兼之谶纬文献中的“洛书”与“河图”有较大的共通性、混同性,可以说“洛书”委实缺乏明确的自我。 When it comes to the context of Chenwei(Divination in combination with Mystical Interpretation of Confucianism)in the Han Dynasty,the two cosmological diagrams,namely Hetu(The River Chart)and Luoshu(The Inscription of the River Luo),reveal textual differences in aspects ranging from ancient versions to contemporary ones,and from unannotated original versions to derivative works.Within derivative works,there are texts extracted from the original work as well as elaborations including annotations and supplemental additions.Therefore,despite the widely-recognized numerosity of Hetu works during Han Dynasty and the official status of the ideology reflected in Hetu Chifu Fu(The Red Hidden Tally of the River Chart),Confucian scholars in the Han Dynasty still came to conclude that“Hetu has not existed in Han.”This is because Hetu Chifu Fu could in fact be subsumed as a derivative work by Confucius who‘laid down a system for Han Empire in recognition that it was destined to rule’deified as an augury suggesting the legitimacy and vitality of the Han Empire.What is worth noticing about Luoshu is its passivity status,namely,as a counterpart to Hetu within a dichotomous relationship yet in a subordinating capacity.The record of Luoshu as the‘imperial edict written in red by the River Luo’and that of it being‘the book of Hetu’were construed as its two facets,with the former exhibiting an equivalent status while the latter has indeed reflected a subordinating one,not to mention the assertion downgrading it as an indication of pseudo-mandate.Coupled with its considerable degree of commonality and homogeneity with Hetu in extant literature,it is fitting to say that Luoshu lacks a clear self-identity.
作者 郭思韵 GUO Siyun(Department of Chinese Language and Literature, New Era University College, Kajang 43000, Malaysia)
出处 《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》 2020年第3期11-18,共8页 Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
关键词 图谶 谶纬 “河图” “洛书” 《河图赤伏符》 Tuchen(Book of Prophecy) Chenwei “Hetu” “Luoshu” Hetu Chifu Fu
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1永良.《礼记·礼运》首段错简应当纠正[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),1996,17(S6):72-73. 被引量:4
  • 2庞朴.《喜读“五至三无”—初读(上博藏简(二))》[EB/OL].“简帛研究”网,(2003/01/12).
  • 3.《<礼记·孔子闲居>与<孔子家语>》[A].杨朝明.《儒家文献与早期儒学研究》[C].齐鲁书社,2002年..
  • 4.《<孔子家语·执辔>篇与孔子的治国思想》[A].杨朝明.《儒家文献与早期儒学研究》[C].齐鲁书社,2002年..
  • 5任铭善.《礼记目录后按》[M].齐鲁书社,1982年.第23页.
  • 6郭沫若.《儒家八派的批判》[A]..《郭沫若全集》历史编第二卷[C].,..
  • 7王梦鸥.《礼记今注今译》影印台湾商务印书馆本[M].天津古籍出版社,1987年..
  • 8杨天宇.《礼记译注》[M].上海古籍出版社,1997年..
  • 9杨朝明 山东省儒学研究基地 曲阜师范大学孔子文化学院编.《新出简帛与早期儒学的重新认识》[A].山东省儒学研究基地、曲阜师范大学孔子文化学院编.《孔子·儒学研究文丛》(一)[C].齐鲁书社,2001年..
  • 10杨朝明.《上博藏竹书(从政)篇“五德”略议—兼说<从政>应该属于<子思子>佚篇》[EB/OL].“简帛研究网”,03/04/23.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部