提问-回答序列第三话轮的“(你)意思(是)+X” 被引量：4

“(Ni) yisi (shi) +X” as the Third Turn in Questioning-Answering Sequence

导出

摘要在汉语日常电话谈话中,出现在不同序列位置的"(你)意思(是)X"可能执行不同的社会行为。本研究应用会话分析的研究方法,探讨提问-回答序列中回答行为之后、以"(你)意思(是)"开始的第三话轮。语料分析发现:出现在这一序列位置的"(你)意思(是)+X"展现了问者在理解答者所提供回答方面存在疑问或困惑,或者说问者认为答者的回答影响了互解的实现,因而问者通过"(你)意思(是)+X"提供某种可能的理解、并同时发起修正,以期答者对此给予确认或否认,甚至进一步解释说明。总的来讲,提问-回答序列第三话轮的"(你)意思(是)+X"展现了问者对回答的不理解和困难,是交际者监控会话发展、力求实现互解的具体体现。 "(Ni) yisi(shi) +X"(literally "(you) mean(be) + X") occurring at different sequential positions may execute various social actions. This research adopts conversation analysis as its research methodology and probes into "(ni) yisi(shi) +X" as the third turn in the questioning/answering sequence. Data analyses prove that "(ni) yisi(shi) +X" at this sequential position displays the questioner’s difficulty in understanding the answer, thus the questioner initiates a repair with "(ni) yisi(shi) +X" to provide the answerer with an opportunity to confirm, disconfirm the questioner’s candidate understanding or even to further provide more relevant details. Our conclusion is that "(ni) yisi(shi) +X" shows the questioner’s local analysis of the answer and displays the questioner’s difficulty in understanding. The overall sequence organization manifests the questioner and answerer’s mutual orientation to the moment-by-moment unfolding of a conversation and their mutual efforts to achieve intersubjectivity in talk-in-interaction.

作者于国栋郭慧吴亚欣 YU Guodong;GUO Hui;WU Yaxin(College of Foreign Languages,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China;School of Foreign Languages,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区中国海洋大学外国语学院山西大学外国语学院

出处《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期30-38,共9页 Journal of Foreign Languages

关键词提问回答 (你)意思(是) 他人发起修正会话分析 questioning answering "(ni)yisi(shi)+X" other-initiated repair conversation analysis

分类号 H0-05 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1于国栋.医患交际中回述的会话分析研究[J].外语教学,2009,30(3):13-19. 被引量：24

二级参考文献10

1Button, G. Conversation-in-a-series[ A]. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman ( eds. ). Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethonomethodology and Conversation Analysis [ C ]. Oxford : Polity Press, 1991 : 251 - 277.
2Drew, P. ' Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997 (28) : 69-101.
3Drew, P. Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch[A]. In P.J. Glenn, C.D. Lebaron, and J. Mandelbaum (eds.). Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper[ C]. Mahwah, HJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2003:293-308.
4Hak , T. & de Boer, F. Formulations in first encounters [ J ]. Journal ofPragmatics, 1996(25) : 83-99.
5Heritage, J. C. & Watson, D.R. Formulations as conversational objects [ A ]. In G. Psathas ( eds. ). Everyday Language : Studies in Ethnomethodology[ C ]. New York : Irvington Publishers, Inc, 1979 : 97- 122.
6Heritage, J.C. Analyzing news interviews : Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience [ A ]. In T. A. Van Dijk ( eds. ). Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Volume 3. Discourse and Dialogue [ C ]. London : Academic Press, 1985 : 95-117.
7Hutchby, I. Confrontational Talk : Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power at Talk Radio [ M ]. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1996.
8Gafaranga, J. & Britten, N. Formulation in general practice consultations[J]. Text,2004,24(2) : 147-170.
9Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, H. On formal structures of practical social action [ A ]. In J. C. Mckinney and E.A. Teryakian ( eds. ). Theoretical Sociology[ C ]. New York : Appleton Century Crofts, 1970 : 338-366.
10Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation [ A ]. In Schenkein, J. ( eds. ). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction [ C]. New York: Academic Press,1978.