摘要
目的探讨自动痔疮套扎术治疗出血性痔疮患者的临床效果。方法选取2017年5月~2019年1月我院收治的50例出血性痔疮患者作为研究对象,根据患者的问诊顺序分配序号,采用随机采样的方式,将50例患者分为观察组(25例)和对照组(25例)。对照组患者施行传统的痔疮套扎术,观察组患者施行自动痔疮套扎术。比较两组患者的手术时间、临床疗效及并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,治疗费用高于对照组,并发症总发生率低于对照组,治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于传统痔疮套扎术,自动痔疮套扎术对出血性痔疮患者的应用效果更为良好,手术时间较短,并发症发生率低,治疗效果明显,值得广大医疗工作者进一步研究以及根据实际情况选用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of automatic hemorrhoids ligation in the treatment of patients with hemorrhagic hemorrhoids. Methods Fifty patients with hemorrhagic hemorrhoids admitted to our hospital from May2017 to January 2019 were selected as subjects. According to the patients′ consultation order, the serial number was assigned, and 50 patients were divided into observation group(25 cases) and control group(25 cases) by random sampling. The control group underwent traditional hemorrhoid ligation, and the observation group underwent automatic hemorrhoid ligation. The operation time, clinical efficacy and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, the treatment cost was higher than that of the control group, the total incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group, and the total effective rate of treatment was higher than that of the control group, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional hemorrhoid ligation, the application effect of automatic hemorrhoid ligation on hemorrhagic hemorrhoid patients is better, the operation time is shorter, the incidence of complications is lower, and the treatment effect is obvious. Therefore, it is worthy of further research by medical workers and selection according to the actual situation.
作者
王峰
WANG Feng(Emergency Surgery,Zibo Mining Group Co.,Ltd.Central Hospital,Shandong Province,Zibo255120,China)
出处
《中国当代医药》
2020年第11期73-75,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
自动痔疮套扎术
出血性痔疮
手术治疗
临床疗效
Automatic hemorrhoids ligation
Hemorrhagic hemorrhoids
Surgical treatment
Clinical efficacy