摘要
理论界对于检察机关审查批捕权性质异化的讨论长期以来一直存在,即便是在捕诉一体化改革之后。批捕权作为启动最严厉刑事强制措施的权力,其根本目标在于保障刑事诉讼的顺利进行;客观价值旨在防止发生社会危险性;本质属性是对侦查机关刑事侦查权的监督。在捕诉一体化视域下,审查批捕权性质存在诸多异化风险:其被动中立性受到质疑、其程序保障异化为事实审查、其存在异化为"预审"制度的风险。对此,应当从构建审查批捕听证制度,实现事实定性与法律裁决分离,完善被追诉人救济机制,细化司法责任制,严格坚持审查批捕证据标准等方面入手,以期实现审查批捕权性质的回归。
The discussion on the alienation of the nature of procuratorial organ's right of examination,approval and arrest has existed in the theoretical circle for a long time.After the reform of the integration of arrest and prosecution,the alienation trend of the right of examination and arrest approval becomes more obvious.As the power to initiate the most severe criminal coercive measures,the fundamental goal of the right of arrest is to ensure the smooth progress of criminal proceedings.Objective value aims at preventing social danger;The essential attribute is the supervision of the criminal investigation right of the investigation organ.From the perspective of the integration of arrest and prosecution,there are many risks of alienation in the nature of the right of examination and approve arrest:passive neutrality is questioned,procedural guarantee is alienated to fact review,and there is a risk of alienation to"pre-trial"system.In this regard,it is necessary to establish the system of examination,approval,arrest and hearing to separate the factual nature from the legal ruling.To improve the relief mechanism of the accused;To refine the judicial responsibility system and strictly adhere to the examination and arrest approval of evidence standards,in order to realize the return of the right of examination and arrest approval.
作者
彭森磊
PENG Senlei(Law Academy,East China University of Political Science and Law,ShangHai,200042)
出处
《实事求是》
2020年第3期74-82,共9页
Seek Truth From Facts
基金
2019年最高人民检察院重点课题“捕诉一体运行机制实证研究”(GJ2019B05)之华东政法大学和华东检察研究院2019年下半年刑诉法学科硕博联动研究课题“捕诉合一视域下强化侦查监督的对策探析”。
关键词
捕诉一体化
审查批捕
预审
异化
回归
Integration of arrest and prosecution
Examination and arrest approval
alienation
Return