期刊文献+

捕诉一体视域下审查批捕权的异化与回归 被引量:1

The Alienation and Return of the Right of Examination and Arrest Approval under the view of the integration of arrest and prosecution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 理论界对于检察机关审查批捕权性质异化的讨论长期以来一直存在,即便是在捕诉一体化改革之后。批捕权作为启动最严厉刑事强制措施的权力,其根本目标在于保障刑事诉讼的顺利进行;客观价值旨在防止发生社会危险性;本质属性是对侦查机关刑事侦查权的监督。在捕诉一体化视域下,审查批捕权性质存在诸多异化风险:其被动中立性受到质疑、其程序保障异化为事实审查、其存在异化为"预审"制度的风险。对此,应当从构建审查批捕听证制度,实现事实定性与法律裁决分离,完善被追诉人救济机制,细化司法责任制,严格坚持审查批捕证据标准等方面入手,以期实现审查批捕权性质的回归。 The discussion on the alienation of the nature of procuratorial organ's right of examination,approval and arrest has existed in the theoretical circle for a long time.After the reform of the integration of arrest and prosecution,the alienation trend of the right of examination and arrest approval becomes more obvious.As the power to initiate the most severe criminal coercive measures,the fundamental goal of the right of arrest is to ensure the smooth progress of criminal proceedings.Objective value aims at preventing social danger;The essential attribute is the supervision of the criminal investigation right of the investigation organ.From the perspective of the integration of arrest and prosecution,there are many risks of alienation in the nature of the right of examination and approve arrest:passive neutrality is questioned,procedural guarantee is alienated to fact review,and there is a risk of alienation to"pre-trial"system.In this regard,it is necessary to establish the system of examination,approval,arrest and hearing to separate the factual nature from the legal ruling.To improve the relief mechanism of the accused;To refine the judicial responsibility system and strictly adhere to the examination and arrest approval of evidence standards,in order to realize the return of the right of examination and arrest approval.
作者 彭森磊 PENG Senlei(Law Academy,East China University of Political Science and Law,ShangHai,200042)
出处 《实事求是》 2020年第3期74-82,共9页 Seek Truth From Facts
基金 2019年最高人民检察院重点课题“捕诉一体运行机制实证研究”(GJ2019B05)之华东政法大学和华东检察研究院2019年下半年刑诉法学科硕博联动研究课题“捕诉合一视域下强化侦查监督的对策探析”。
关键词 捕诉一体化 审查批捕 预审 异化 回归 Integration of arrest and prosecution Examination and arrest approval alienation Return
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈卫东.刑事申诉制度改革研究[J].法学家,1999(4):57-65. 被引量:18
  • 2邓思清.完善我国刑事再审启动程序之构想[J].当代法学,2004,18(3):142-154. 被引量:11
  • 3高峰.从《欧洲人权公约》看检察官的中立性[J].人民检察,2006(06S):54-57. 被引量:4
  • 4[日]松尾浩也.《日本刑事诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社,2005年版,第42页.
  • 5联合国网站.http://daccessdds.un. org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/GO5/102/74/PDF/G0510274, pdf,2006年6月2日浏览.
  • 6杨立新.“刑事诉讼平衡论”.中国政法大学博士论文,第96页.
  • 7William J. Stuntz: "Warrant and Fourth Amendment Remedies" ,77 Va. L. Rev. at 895( 1991 ).
  • 8William J. Stuntz: "Warrant and Fourth Amendment Remedies", 77 Va. L. Rev. at 895 ( 1991 ).
  • 9陈瑞华."未决羁押制度的理论反思".陈光中主编.《中德强制措施国际研讨会论文集》,中国人民公安大学出版社2003年版,第88页.
  • 10Johnson v. U.S. ,333 U.S. 10,13-14(1948).

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部