我国大学社会责任的制度化路径探析--基于南开大学与台湾高雄科技大学的对比分析

An Analysis of the Institutionalized Path of Social Responsibility of Chinese Universities—the Comparative Analysis of Nankai University and Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology

制度性保障是大学社会责任履行机制的重要构成部分,然而当前我国大陆地区大学社会责任的制度设计与社会需求出现了严重的偏离。针对这一问题,在历史制度主义理论的指导下,以南开大学与台湾高雄科技大学大学社会责任制度设计的差异塑造过程为例,揭示了大陆高校与台湾高校社会责任制度设计出现差异的深层原因。研究发现,观念差异导致了大陆与台湾高校社会责任定位的不同;参与主体差异导致了两地大学社会责任运作模式的不同;权力的不对称性差异使得两地大学社会责任的制度选择过程呈现为“顶层设计”与“多主体参与”两种不同的决策方式。在此基础上,提炼了一些改善大陆大学社会责任制度化的意见,以期能够为促进我国大学社会责任的建设服务。

Institutional security is an important part of the university’s social responsibility fulfillment mechanism. However,the current institutional design of university social responsibility in China's Mainland has deviated significantly from social needs. In response to this problem,under the guidance of historical institutionalism theory,this article takes the difference shaping process of the social responsibility system design of Nankai University and Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology as an example to reveal the deeper reason of differences in the design of social responsibility system between mainland universities and Taiwan universities. The study found that differences in perception led to differences in the positioning of social responsibilities between universities in China's Mainland and Taiwan;differences in participating subjects led to differences in the modes of social responsibility operations of universities;differences in power asymmetry made the selection process system for universities are two different decision-making methods: " top-level design" and "multi-participator". On this basis,the article has refined some suggestions for improving the institutionalization of social responsibility of mainland universities,with a view to serving the construction of social responsibility of universities in China.