摘要
文章基于InCites数据库和ESI学科分类,比较中美高校在22个学科的科研产出规模、质量、影响力差距和活跃学科分布特点。研究发现:中国C9高校科研产出规模普遍提升,但不同学科呈现不同特点;美国10所高校的科研产出规模与质量相对一致,中国C9高校存在不一致现象;美国10所高校对理学关注度已明显下降,空间科学和交叉学科变得炙手可热;中国C9高校从偏重理工向多极化转变,交叉学科关注度重现,生命科学和医学在个别高校中关注度提升。
Based on the InCites database and ESI subject classification,this paper compares the scale,quality,influence gap and distribution characteristics of active subjects in 22 disciplines of Chinese and Ameri-can universities.The findings are as follows:The scale of scientific research output of C9 universities in China is generally expanded,but different disciplines show different characteristics.The scale and quality of scientifie research output of 10 American universities are relatively consistent,while the C9 universities in China are in-consistent.10 universities in the United States have paid less attention to the science discipline,and keen on space science and interdisciplinary studies.China's C9 universities have shifted from science and technology to.multi-polarization,the interdisciplinary attention has resurfaced,and life science and medicine have received increasing attention in some colleges and universities.
作者
彭正霞
PENG Zheng-xia(Political Research Office,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,710049,China)
出处
《高等理科教育》
2020年第2期38-48,共11页
Higher Education of Sciences
基金
西安交通大学基本科研业务费专项研究项目(项目编号:SK2018068)。
关键词
C9高校
美国10所高校
学科发展
一流大学
C9 universities
10 universities in the United States
disciplinary development
the first-class university