期刊文献+

合作行为中的“眼睛效应”:解释机制与限制因素 被引量:7

The “watching-eyes effect” in cooperative behavior: Potential mechanisms and limiting factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 呈现眼睛特征的图片就能使人的行为发生变化的现象称为眼睛效应。眼睛效应存在于多种社会现象中,合作行为中的眼睛效应已被多种实验证明,其原理可从声誉机制、规则机制、奖惩机制及认知机制等视角予以解释。眼睛效应的发生受在场他人、任务类型、个体公众意识及群体身份、线索呈现方式等因素的限制。目前有关眼睛效应的稳定性仍存在较多争议,未来需要从性别和文化等个体或群体差异、脑生理机制、社会应用价值等方面进行深入研究。 The watching-eyes effect is a phenomenon where an individual’s behavior changes in response to images depicting eyes. Multiple experiments have shown that this effect occurs during cooperative behavior. Several psychological processes can explain the watching-eyes effect, including reputation, the rule mechanism, reward and punishment, as well as various cognitive mechanisms. Additionally, some factors seem to limit the effect, including presence of others, task type, individual public consciousness, group identity, and cue(i.e., eyes image) presentation method. Currently, the stability of the watching-eyes effect remains controversial. Thus, future studies should examine individual or intergroup differences that could potentially influence stability. Notable variables include gender, culture, brain physiology, and socialapplication value.
作者 吴琴 崔丽莹 WU Qin;CUI Liying(Department of Psychology,College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期994-1003,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 合作行为 眼睛效应 注视眼 cooperative behavior watching-eyes effect watching eyes
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

  • 1郭小艳,王振宏.积极情绪的概念、功能与意义[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):810-815. 被引量:305
  • 2海斯蒂.R,道斯.R.M(谢晓非,李纾译).不确定世界的理性选择-判断与决策心理学.北京:人民邮电出版社,(2013)..
  • 3Abele,S.,Stasser,G.,& Chartier,C.(2010).Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods:A conceptual analysis of continuous and step-level games.Personality and Social Psychology Review,14,385-401.
  • 4Axelrod,R.(1984).The evolution of cooperation.New York:Basic Books.
  • 5Arbak,E.,& Villeval,M.-C.(2013).Endogenous leadership:Selection and influence.Social Choice and Welfare,40,635-662.
  • 6Balliet,D.,Parks,C.D.,& Joireman,J.(2009).Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas:A meta-analysis.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,12,533-547.
  • 7Barclay,P.(2012).Proximate and ultimate causes of punishment and strong reciprocity.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,35,16-17.
  • 8Bogaert,S.,Boone,C.,& Declerck,C.(2008).Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas:A review and conceptual model.British Journal of Social Psychology,47,453-480.
  • 9Campbell,D.T.(1958).Common fate,similarity,and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities.Behavioral Science,3,14-25.
  • 10Dawes,R.M.(1980).Social dilemmas.Annual Review of Psychology,31,169-193.

共引文献78

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部