期刊文献+

广西区潜水含水层防污性能评价与研究

Evaluation and study on antifouling performance of subsurface aquifer in Guangxi Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章利用DRASTIC模型,模型包括地下水埋深(D)、含水层净补给量(R)、含水层介质类型(A)、土壤类型(S)、地形坡度(T)、包气带岩性(I)和含水层的导水系数(C)7个因子,对广西区潜水防污性能进行评价。结果表明:潜水含水层防污性能较好区总面积1.55×10^4 km^2,占全区面积的6.54%;潜水含水层防污性能中等区总面积17.31×10^4 km^2,占全区面积的73.04%;潜水含水层防污性能较差区总面积4.84×10^4 km^2,占全区面积的20.42%。其成果可为广西区地下水污染防治和生态文明建设、环境保护等提供指导和借鉴。 This paper used DRASTIC model,which includes 7 factors:groundwater depth(D),net aquifer recharge(R),aquifer medium type(A),soil type(S),topographic slope(T),gas encasement lithology(I)and aquifer conductivity coefficient(C),to evaluate the diving antifouling performance of the western district.The results showed that the total area of the subsurface aquifer with good antifouling performance was 1.55×10^4 km^2,accounting for 6.54%of the total area.The total area of the medium area with antifouling performance of the submerged aquifer is 17.31×10^4 km^2,accounting for 73.04% of the total area.The total area of the subsurface aquifer with poor antifouling performance is 4.84×1^04 km^2,accounting for 20.42% of the total area.The results can provide guidance and reference for groundwater pollution prevention and control,ecological civilization construction and environmental protection in Guangxi.
作者 周海玲 江思义 李淑萍 ZHOU Hai-ling;JIANG Si-yi;LI Shu-ping(The Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region geological Environment Monitoring Station,Nanning 530029,Guangxi,China)
出处 《资源信息与工程》 2020年第2期101-105,共5页 Resource Information and Engineering
基金 中国地质环境监测院地质调查项目(中地环发{2001}54号) 广西壮族自治区自然资源厅与广西壮族自治区环境保护局地质调查项目(桂环发[2007]7号)。
关键词 DRASTIC模型 潜水 含水层 防污性能 广西 DRASTIC model aquifer antifouling performance Guangxi Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1赵华,马金珠,朱高峰,李相虎.甘肃省民勤盆地地下水环境变化及原因探讨[J].干旱区研究,2004,21(3):210-214. 被引量:28
  • 2李智佩,岳乐平,薛祥煦,田春声,卢峰.民勤盆地水资源环境与可持续发展[J].地球科学与环境学报,2005,27(3):95-99. 被引量:8
  • 3王宏伟,刘萍,吴美琼.基于地下水脆弱性评价方法的综述[J].黑龙江水利科技,2007,35(3):43-45. 被引量:14
  • 4SCHIK)SSER S A, McCRAY J E, HYLE E M. A subregional-scale method to assess aquifer vulnerability to pesticides[J]. Ground Water, 2002, 40(4):361-367.
  • 5ALLEIR L, BENNETT T, LEHR J H, et al. DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeological settings[A]. ROBERT S K. US EPA Report[R]. Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada Oklahorrm,1985.
  • 6IBE K M, COLLIN M L, MELLOULA J. Assessment of ground water vulnerability and its application to the development of protection strategy for the water supply aquifer in Owerri southern Nigeria[J]. EnvironmentalMonitoring and Assessment, 2001, 67:323-360.
  • 7KIM Y J, HAMM S Y. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique in Cheogju area, South Korea[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7:227-235.
  • 8SECUNDA S, COlA.IN M L, MEI.LOUI. A J. Ground water vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Saron region[J]. J Environ Management, 1998, 54:39-57.
  • 9VIERHUFF H. Classification of groundwater resources for regional planning with regard to their vulnerability to pollution[A], van DUIJVENBOODEN W, GLASBERGEN P,van LEYVELD H. Studies in Environmental Science EC].1981,17:1101-1104.
  • 10GOGU R C, DASSARGUES A. Current trends and future challenges in ground water vulnerability assessment using overly and index methods[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000,39 (6):549-559.

共引文献185

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部