期刊文献+

聚醚醚酮棒半刚性固定系统在腰椎融合术中的应用 被引量:3

Clinical Application of Polyetheretherketone Rod Semi-rigid Fixation System in Lumbar Fusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较聚醚醚酮(PEEK)棒半刚性固定系统和钛棒刚性固定系统在腰椎融合术中的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年6月至2018年6月行后路椎间植骨融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎退变性疾病患者54例,按照内固定材料分为两组(PEEK棒组27例,钛棒组27例)。其中男18例,女36例;年龄52~72岁,平均(54.6±4.3)岁。所有患者术前均行腰椎正侧位X线片、腰椎过伸过屈X线片、CT平扫、腰椎MRI检查。通过比较两组患者术前及术后3,6,12个月Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和日本骨科学会(JOA)评分评价临床疗效。术后3,6,12个月通过Brantigan椎间融合标准评价植骨融合情况。结果:54例患者术后均得到随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均(16.4±4.2)个月。所有患者均未出现伤口感染、脑脊液漏、内固定松动及断裂等并发症。术后3,6,12个月两组患者ODI均呈下降趋势,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3,6,12个月两组患者JOA评分均呈上升趋势,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月PEEK棒组融合率高于钛棒组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月两组患者融合率均为100%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PEEK棒半刚性固定系统与钛棒内固定系统在腰椎融合术中均可取得良好临床疗效,但PPEK棒半刚性固定系统早期融合疗效更佳。 Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of polyetheretherketone(PEEK)rod semi-rigid fixation system and titanium rod rigid fixation system in lumbar fusion.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 54 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)for the treatment of lumbar degeneration from June 2015 to June2018 in our department.According to the internal fixation materials,the patients were divided into two groups:27 patients in the PEEK rod group and 27 patients in the titanium rod group.There were 18 males and 36 females.The average age was 52~72 years old(54.6±4.3).All patients were received positive and lateral lumbar X-ray,lumbar hyperextension and hyperflexion X-ray,plain CT scan,and lumbar MRI before surgery.Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI)and Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA)scores at 3,6 and 12 months before and after surgery were compared between the two groups to evaluate the clinical efficacy.The bone graft fusion was evaluated by Brantigan intervertebral fusion criteria at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively.Results:All the 54 patients were followed up after surgery from 12 to 24 months,an average of(16.4±4.2)months.None of the patient had complications such as surgical incision infection,cerebrospinal fluid leakage,loosing or breaking internal fixation,and others complications.Oswestry dysfunction index of the two groups decreased at 3,6 and 12 months after surgery,and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Postoperative JOA scores of patients in the two groups showed an increasing trend at 3,6 and 12 months after surgery,and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).3 months after surgery,the fusion rate of PEEK stick group was higher than that of titanium stick group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).6 months after surgery,the fusion rate of the two groups was 100%,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:PEEK semi-rigid fixation system and titanium rod internal fixation system can achieve equal clinical efficacy in lumbar fusion.But the PEEK rods semi-rigid fixation system early fusion curative effect is better.
作者 王河忠 刘洋 谭俊峰 WANG Hezhong;LIU Yang;TAN Junfeng(Department of Orthopedics,the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan(the Second Hospital Affiliated of Jianghan University),Wuhan 430050,China)
出处 《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 CAS 2020年第4期36-40,共5页 Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词 聚醚醚酮棒 钛棒 腰椎融合术 polyetheretherketone rod titanium rod lumbar interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献64

  • 1翁习生,邱贵兴,李军伟,赵宏,仉建国,沈建雄,林进.椎弓根螺钉翻修术[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(9):515-519. 被引量:26
  • 2郑燕平,刘新宇,贾龙,王延国,黎君彦.腰椎后路椎间融合术后椎间融合的X线片及三维CT评价[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(12):1104-1108. 被引量:22
  • 3Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, et al. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(10): 1094- 1109. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc.
  • 4Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, et al. Trends, major medical com- plications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults[J]. JAMA, 2010, 303(13): 1259- 1265. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.
  • 5Ekman P, Moiler H, Shalabi A, et al. A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc de- generation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(8): 1175-1186. DOI: 10.1007 /s00586-009-0947-3.
  • 6Chamoli U, Diwan AD, Tsafnat N. Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilizers for degenerative spine: in vitro biomechanical testing and clinical outcomes[J]. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2014, 102(9): 3324-3340. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34986.
  • 7Jahng TA, Kim YE, Moon KY. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis[J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(1): 85-94. DOI: 10.1016/j. spinee.2012.11.014.
  • 8Barrey C, Perrin G, Champain S. Pedicle-Screw-Based Dynamic Systems and Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Biomechanical and Clinical Experiences of Dynamic Fusion with Isobar TI'L[J]. IS- RN Orthop, 2013, 183702. DOI: 10.1155/2013/183702.
  • 9Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK. Rationale, principles and experi- mental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization[J]. Eur Spine J, 2002, 11 Suppl 2: S198-205. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-O422-x.
  • 10Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY. Classification of posterior dynam- ic stabilization devices[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2007, 22(1): E3.

共引文献27

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部