颈部五线按动法治疗颈源性头痛临床疗效观察

Clinical observation on the treatment of cervicogenic headache with five-line neck movement

目的观察研究王友仁主任医师颈部五线按动法治疗颈源性头痛的临床疗效。方法收集颈源性头痛患者120例,随机分为两组,推拿治疗组(颈部五线按动法治疗组)、针灸治疗组,每组60例,由具有丰富临床经验的医师于室温对处于安静状态下的患者进行相应治疗,分别采集治疗第0次、10次时患者头痛症状、结合VAS评分,对比推拿治疗与针灸治疗的差异性,探讨颈部五线按动法治疗颈源性头痛作用机理。结果推拿治疗组总有效率为93.3%,针灸治疗组总有效率为80%,两组患者总有效率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗第10次后,推拿治疗组与针灸治疗组VAS评分均优于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),推拿治疗组治疗后VAS评分优于针灸治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论结合以上结论分析可以发现颈部五线按动法可以有效缓解颈源性头痛症状。

Objective To study the clinical efficacy of the chief physician Wang Youren's five-line neck press for the treatment of cervical headache.Methods A total of 120 patients with cervical headache were randomly divided into two groups:massage therapy group(neck five-line movement therapy group)and acupuncture treatment group,60 cases in each group.The patients were treated accordingly in the quiet state.The headache symptoms at the 0th and 10th treatments,the VAS score,and the differences between massage therapy and acupuncture were compared.Then To explore the mechanism of neck five line pressing therapy for cervicogenic headache.Results The total effective rate was 93.3%in the massage therapy group(neck five-line action group),and the total effective rate was 80%in the acupuncture group.The total effective rate of the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Comparison of VAS pain scores between the two groups:after ten times of treatment,The VAS scores of the massage therapy group(neck five-line movement therapy group)and the acupuncture group were better than those before treatment(P<0.05).After treatment,the VAS score of the massage treatment group(neck fiveline action group)was better than that of the acupuncture treatment group(P<0.05).Conclusion Based on the analysis of the above conclusions,it can be found that the five-line neck treatment can effectively alleviate the symptoms of cervical headache,and has a strong potential for popularization.