期刊文献+

新型智库绩效考评机制建设难点及路径选择——基于激励约束并重视角 被引量:1

Research on the Performance Evaluation Mechanism of New Think Tank:from the Dual Perspective of Stimulation and Constraint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新时期,党和政府决策咨询服务需求快速增长。智库队伍是智库智力供给能力的根本,是智库影响力与竞争力的核心所在,队伍建设是新型智库发展的重要命题。针对智库考评存在的激励约束导向异化、激励约束标准粗糙以及激励约束手段单一等问题,应构建激励约束并重的新型智库绩效考评机制,突出以实践为导向激励约束标准,不断创新多元并进的激励约束方式,调动智库队伍的积极性、主动性与创造性,突出新型智库绩效考评机制的激励约束效应,进而推进中国特色新型智库建设,为党和国家决策咨询做出更多的智力贡献。 In the new era,the demand for the party and government decision-making consulting services is growing rapidly.The think tank team is the foundation of the intelligence supply ability of think tanks and the core of think tank's influence and competitiveness.Team building is an important proposition for the development of new think tanks.Aiming at the problems in the evaluation of think tanks,such as alienation of incentive constraints and rough standards of incentive constraints and single means of incentive constraints,we are supposed to build a new type of think tank performance evaluation mechanism and highlight practice-oriented incentive and restraint standards.And we constantly innovate and diversify the progressive incentive and restraint methods,mobilize the enthusiasm,initiative and creativity of think tank teams,highlight the incentive and constraint effects of the new think tank performance evaluation mechanism.And as a result,we promote the construction of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics and make more intellectual contributions to the party and state decision-making consultation.
作者 易文波 成志刚 YI Wen-bo;CHENG Zhi-gang(School of Public Administration,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期56-60,共5页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 新型智库 绩效 考评机制 激励约束 New Think Tank performance evaluation mechanism incentive and restraint
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1任晓.第五种权力——美国思想库的成长、功能及运作机制[J].现代国际关系,2000(7):18-22. 被引量:76
  • 2贠杰.中国公共政策研究的现状分析[J].政治学研究,2001(1):26-34. 被引量:14
  • 3朱旭峰.美国思想库对社会思潮的影响[J].现代国际关系,2002(8):42-46. 被引量:30
  • 4Dickson P. Think Tanks [ M ]. New York, Atheneum,1971. 47,1-3,26-35.
  • 5Capital Source. National Journal [ R]. Washington DC, 1988.
  • 6Lander R K. Think Tank: The New Partisan? [ R]. Editorial Research Reports, 1986.
  • 7McGann J G. Academic to ideologues: A brief history of the public policy research industry [ J]. Political Science and Politics, 1992, 25(4) : 733 -740.
  • 8张登义.中国软科学研究机构要览[M].北京:兵器工业出版社,1989.
  • 9科学技术部办公厅.全国软科学调查统计报告(2001—2002)[R].内部报告,2003.
  • 10James Simon. The idea brokers: The impact of think tanks on British government [ J ]. Public Administration, 1993, (71) : 491 -506.

共引文献223

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部