期刊文献+

健康教育护理干预对慢性盆腔炎住院患者的效果探讨 被引量:9

Effects of health education nursing intervention on hospitalized patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨健康教育护理干预对慢性盆腔炎住院患者的效果。方法对2017年10月~2019年10月于我院接受治疗的74例慢性盆腔炎患者按照奇偶法分组,对照组(n=37)接受常规护理干预,观察组(n=37)在此基础上加强健康教育,分析干预前后患者知识掌握优良率、临床症状体征改善时间及生活质量。结果观察组患者知识掌握优良率为94.60%,对照组为75.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,观察组患者下腹不适、腰骶酸痛、白带异常改善时间更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理干预前,两组患者生活质量评分比较,差异无统计意义(P>0.05);护理实施后,与对照组比较,观察组患者生活质量评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对慢性盆腔炎住院患者实施健康教育护理干预,可有效促进患者疾病认知度,缩短临床症状改善时间,提高生活质量。 Objective To explore the effect of health education nursing intervention on patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease(CPID).Methods 74 patients with CPID who were treated in our hospital from October 2017 to October 2019 were divided into two groups by using odd even number method.The control group(n=37)received routine nursing intervention,while the observation group(n=37)was given health education nursing on the above basis.Before and after the intervention,the excellent rate of knowledge acquisition,clinical symptoms and signs improvement time,and quality of life were analyzed.Results The excellent rate of knowledge acquisition in the observation group was 94.60%,while the control group was 75.67%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the observation group had less time in abdomen discomfort,lumbosacral soreness,and abnormal leucorrhea improvement with statistical significance(P<0.05).Before intervention,there was no statistical difference in the quality of life scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After intervention,compared with the control group,the observation group had higher quality of life scores,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Health education nursing interventions for hospitalized patients with CPID can effectively promote patients'disease awareness,shorten the time to improve clinical symptoms,and improve quality of life.
作者 周妍 ZHOU Yan(Department of Gynecology,Hunan Provincial People's Hospital,Changsha410000,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2020年第10期182-184,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 健康教育 护理干预 慢性盆腔炎 住院患者 Health education Nursing intervention Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease Hospitalized patients
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献96

  • 1金钰梅,朱胜春,邵翠颖,潘清兮.家庭干预对高血压患者生活质量的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(9):671-673. 被引量:48
  • 2李翠蛾,柯娟,汤利红,张金梅,赵永艳,吴艳,陈新珍.慢性盆腔炎患者的心理状态调查分析[J].护士进修杂志,2006,21(7):597-598. 被引量:17
  • 3岳凤杰.健康教育护理干预对盆腔炎住院患者的护理效果[J].中国保健营养(上旬刊),2014,24(7) : 4181.
  • 4Gradison M. Pelvic inflammatory disease [ J ]. Am Fam Physician, 2012, 85 (8): 791-796.
  • 5Liou TH, Wu CW, Hao WR, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction in women with pelvic inflammatory disease [ J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 167 (2) : 416-420.
  • 6Crofts M, Mead K, Persad R, eta|. How to manage the chronic pel- vic pain syndrome in men presenting to sexual health services [ J ]. Sex Transm Infect, 2014, 90 (5): 370-373.
  • 7Sweet RL. Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease [J]. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 2011: 561909.
  • 8Incebiyik A, Seker A, Vural M, et al. May mean platelet volume lev- els be a predictor in the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease? [J]. Wien Klin Woehenschr, 2014, 126 (13-14) : 422-426.
  • 9Trent M, Lehmann HP, Qian Q, et al. Adolescent and parental util- ities for the health states associated with pelvic inflammatory disease [J]. Sex Transm Infect, 2011, 87 (7) : 583-587.
  • 10李秀娟,徐秋红.健康教育护理干预对盆腔炎住院患者的护理效果观察[J].中国保健营养(上旬刊),2014,24(5):2670-2671.

共引文献152

同被引文献75

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部