期刊文献+

非机动车驾驶人愤怒情绪及行为对交通安全影响分析 被引量:1

Analysis About the Influence of Anger and Behavior Belonging to Non-motor Vehicle Drivers on Traffic Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了从非机动车驾驶人角度考虑愤怒情绪对交通安全的影响,编制非机动车驾驶人愤怒量表(the DAS for Cyclists,CAS),通过量表调查的数据结果,对量表的信度效度进行分析;以及对非机动车驾驶人愤怒行为与违规频率建立有序回归(Ordinal Regression)和多项Logistic回归模型,分析了模型的拟合度和显著性,并对愤怒情绪对非机动车驾驶人交通安全影响程度进行描述性统计分析。结果表明:CAS量表克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach'sα)0.812,KMO(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)=0.813,Bartlett球形检验的卡方近似值(Approx.Chi-Square)=531.519,P=0.000<0.005,该量表具备较高的信度和效度。愤怒行为(骑行途中的跟车距离远近、埋怨激怒自己的司机的频率)与违规频率存在相应的回归关系,且成正相关,非机动车驾驶人愤怒情绪及其行为对交通安全影响较大,与个体生理心理特征也有很大相关性。 In order to consider the influence of anger on traffic safety from the perspective of non-motor vehicle drivers,the DAS for cycles(CAS)was developed.The reliability and validity of the CAS were analyzed based on the data of the survey,and the ordinal regression and multiple LOS were established for the anger behavior and violation frequency of non-motor vehicle drivers to analyze the fit and significance of the model,and make a descriptive statistical analysis of the impact of anger on the traffic safety of non-motor vehicle drivers.The results showed that Cronbach'sαwas 0.812,KMO was 0.813,approx.Chi square was 531.519,P=0.000<0.005.The scale had high reliability and validity.There is a positive correlation between the angry behavior(the frequency of following the car far and near,complaining the driver who irritates you)and the violation frequency.The angry emotion and behavior of non-motor vehicle drivers,which are linked to individual physiological and psychological characteristics,have a great impact on traffic safety.
作者 周建 林丽 ZHOU Jian;LIN Li(College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China)
出处 《物流工程与管理》 2020年第5期166-168,141,共4页 Logistics Engineering and Management
基金 住房和城乡建设部科学技术计划项目(2014-k5-007)。
关键词 交通安全 愤怒情绪及行为 愤怒量表 信度效度 回归分析 traffic safety anger and behavior anger scale reliability and validity regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1祝蓓里.POMS量表及简式中国常模简介[J].天津体育学院学报,1995,10(1):35-37. 被引量:288
  • 2Deffenbacher J L, Lynch R S, Oetting E R, et al. The driving anger expression inventory: A measure of how people express their anger on the road [ J ]. Behavior Re- search and Therapy,2002,40 (6) :717 - 737.
  • 3NHTSA. Traffic safety facts 2007 : a compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting sys- tem and the general estimates system [ R ]. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2007:32 - 43.
  • 4Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety. State of the road:A fact sheet of the centre for accident research and road safety-Queensland [EB/OL]. [2009- 12- 31]. http://www, carrsq, qut. edu. au/publications / drink_ driving_fs, pdf,2008 - 10/2009 - 12 -31.
  • 5Amanda N S, John A G. Situational specificity of trait in- fluences on drivers' evaluations and driving behaviour [ J ]. Transportation Research Part F, 2009, 12 ( 1 ) : 29 -39.
  • 6Gunilla M. Bjorklund. Driver irritation and aggressive be- haviour [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008,40 (3) :1069 - 1077.
  • 7Murray Millar. The influence of public self-consciousness and anger on aggressive driving [ J ]. Personality and In- dividual Differences ,2007,43 (8) :2116 - 2126.
  • 8张凤,李永娟,蒋丽.驾驶行为理论模型研究概述[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(2):23-28. 被引量:22
  • 9钟铭恩,洪汉池,袁志群.愤怒情绪对驾驶行为影响的实验[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2011,25(10):6-11. 被引量:24
  • 10孙龙.驾驶员人格特质研究述评[J].社会心理科学,2013(1):16-20. 被引量:19

共引文献39

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部