期刊文献+

不同杉木半同胞家系种子品质比较分析研究 被引量:7

Comparison on Seed Quality of Different Half-sib Families of Cunninghamia lanceolata
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨不同杉木Cunninghamia Lanceolata半同胞家系种子的品质特征,对江西省赣州市崇义县高坌林场省级杉木良种基地二代杉木种子园20个半同胞家系种子的球果鲜质量、种子总质量、出籽率、种子千粒质量、优良度等进行比较研究。结果表明,不同的杉木半同胞种子在球果鲜质量、种子总质量、种子千粒质量和优良度方面均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。73号半同胞家系种子整体品质最好,其球果鲜质量、种子总质量最大,分别达到0.4067kg,16.2335 g,种子的千粒质量、优良度、出籽率分别为8.1360 g,44%,3.99%,且千粒质量和优良度显著大于绝大部分家系种子(P<0.05)。29,31,35号半同胞家系种子各项品质指标均靠前,整体品质较好。杉木半同胞家系种子的出籽率与球果鲜质量、种子总质量、千粒质量、优良度值均不存在单一的正相关性。半同胞家系的种子品质与种子品质指标的离散程度没有相关性。 Fresh cones of 20 half-sib families of Cunninghamia Lanceolata were collected from Second Generation Clonal Seed Orchard in Ganzhou,Jiangxi province in October 2018.Determinations were implemented on their fresh cone weight,seed weight,seed yield,thousand seed weight and seed soundness.The results showed that there were significant differences in seed fresh cone weight,seed weight,thousand seed weight and seed soundness among 20 half-sib families.The family of No.73 had the best seed quality,with the largest fresh cone weight and seed weight of 0.4067 kg and 16.2335 g,while its thousand seed weight,seed soundness and seed yield had 8.1360 g,44%and 3.99%,and the thousand seed weight and seed soundness was significantly higher than most families.Followed were families such as No.29,No.31 and No.35.The experiment demonstrated that it had no single positive correlation between seed yield with fresh cone weight,seed weight,thousand seed weight and seed soundness.There was no correlation between seed quality and the dispersion degree of seed quality index.
作者 朱江华 甘伟涛 欧斌 王建皓 刘华新 ZHU Jiang-hua;GAN Wei-tao;OU Bin;WANG Jian-hao;LIU Hua-xin(Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College,Ganzhou 341000,China;Chongyi Forestry Co.,LTD.of Jangxi,Chongyi 341300,China)
出处 《浙江林业科技》 2020年第1期17-22,共6页 Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology
基金 江西省林业科技创新专项“赣南杉木高世代种子园无性系选育”(201504) 中央财政林业科技推广项目“杉木嫁接种子园快速成园技术推广与示范”(JXTG〔2018〕-09号)。
关键词 杉木 半同胞家系 种子品质 综合评价 Cunninghamia lanceolata half-sib family seed quality comprehensive assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献150

共引文献210

同被引文献90

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部