期刊文献+

我国刑法中管理秩序法益还原为实体性法益之提倡 被引量:50

Advocacy of Legal Interest of Management Order in Chinese Criminal Law Restored into Substantive Legal Interest
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前我国刑法理论往往将行政犯的法益界定为管理秩序(制度)法益,但是对于这一法益的界定,要么语焉不详、要么将其界定为抽象的行政管理秩序(制度),如此模糊的界定,使管理秩序法益日益沦为"口袋法益"。产生这一问题的根本原因在于误认为所有行政法益均可以在达到一定量的情况下上升为刑事法益,加之没有区分刑法法益与规范保护目的,导致单纯的行政管理秩序混入刑法法益之中。应将前置法秩序和单纯行政管理秩序这两个行政法益从当前刑法法益中驱逐出去,根据法秩序统一原理借助前置法将适格的刑法管理秩序法益还原为实体性法益。 At present,our criminal law theory often defines the legal interests of administrative Crime(mala prohibita)as the legal interests of management order(system).However,the definition of the legal interest is either vague or abstract administrative order(system).Such a vague definition reduces the legal interests of management order to"pocket legal interests".The root cause of this problem lies in the misunderstanding that all administrative legal interests can reach a certain amount and rise to criminal legal interests.In addition,there is no distinction between the legal interests of criminal law and the purpose of normative protection of criminal law,which leads to the entry of a simple administrative order into the legal interests of criminal law.The two administrative legal interests of the pre-criminal law order and the simple administrative order should be expelled from the current legal interests of the criminal law.With the help of unity of the legal order,the legal interests of the proper criminal law management order can be restored into substantive interests.
作者 李文吉 LI Wen-ji(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期2-19,共18页 Hebei Law Science
基金 2018年江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目《人工智能体的刑事风险与刑法应对》(KYCX18_2442)。
关键词 法定犯 行政犯 管理秩序法益 实体性法益 法秩序统一 mala prohibita administrative crime legal interest of management order substantive legal interest unity of the legal order
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献687

共引文献2807

同被引文献814

引证文献50

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部