期刊文献+

辛伐他汀联合氯吡格雷治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床有效率分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析辛伐他汀联合氯吡格雷治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床有效率。方法选取本院收治的106例不稳定型心绞痛患者,根据不同治疗方案将其分成两组各53例,对照组采用常规治疗,观察组在此基础上采用辛伐他汀联合氯吡格雷治疗,5周后比较两组患者的治疗前后的血脂水平变化情况、疗效和不良反应发生情况。结果治疗前组间两组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)比较无明显差异;治疗后观察组的TC(5.05±0.72)mmol/L和LDL-C(2.61±0.73)mmol/L明显低于对照组的(5.52±0.64)mmol/L和(3.14±0.67)mmol/L;观察组治疗有效率(96.1%)明显高于对照组(84.3%);对照组不良反应发生率为(11.8%),观察组为(7.8%),两组的不良反应发生率比较无显著差异。结论辛伐他汀联合氯吡格雷治疗不稳定型心绞痛可有效调节血脂水平,提升疗效,安全性良好。
出处 《心血管病防治知识(学术版)》 2020年第1期17-18,共2页 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献92

  • 1柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2140
  • 2Ana SR, Slavica Radovanovic, Tatjana P, et al. The role of serum VCAM-1 and TNF-a as predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2013,27 (2) :213-217.
  • 3Cappuzzello C,Di Vito L, Melchionna R, et al. Increase of plasma IL-9 and decrease of plasma IL-5, IL-7, and IFN-7 in patients with chronic heart failure[J].Journal of Translational Medicine, 2011, 9(1): 28-33.
  • 4Olsen V, Rohde LE, Beck-da-Silva L, et al. QRS widening rates and genetic polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases in a cohort of patients with chronic heart failure[J]. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2014,30 (3) : 345-351.
  • 5Christian Z,Peter M. Ivabradine treatment in a chronic heart fail- ure patient cohort: symptom reduction and improvement in quality of life in clinical practice[J]. Advances in Therapy, 2014,31(9): 961-974.
  • 6Stephen AH, Ronald AB, Lina S, et al. Use of BNP and NT-proB- NP for the diagnosis of heart failure in the emergency depart- ment:a systematic review of the evidence[J]. Heart Failure Re- views,2014,19(4) :421-438.
  • 7Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 8Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 9Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 10Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.

共引文献650

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部