期刊文献+

全脑CTP定量分析颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者血管表面渗透性 被引量:7

Quantitative analysis of vascular permeability surface area product in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with whole brain CTP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用计算机断层扫描灌注成像(CTP)观察颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)患者脑组织血管表面渗透性(PS)和血流动力学状态及治疗后改变。方法对59例ICAS患者(ICAS组)及16名志愿者(对照组)行全脑CTP,并对ICAS组17例行责任血管支架植入术。采用定量分析软件测量责任动脉供血区血管PS、血流动力学参数[脑血流量(CBF)、血容量(CBV)及平均通过时间(MTT)],并获得健侧镜像值,比较2组血管PS及血流动力学参数的差异,对比ICAS组支架植入前后血管PS及血流动力学参数变化,分析血管PS与血流动力学参数的相关性。结果相比对照组,ICAS组患侧血管PS值增高、CBF减低、MTT延长(t=7.77、-4.84、7.47,P均<0.05)。相比健侧,ICAS组患侧血管PS值增高、CBF减低、CBV增加、MTT延长(t=-4.38、-4.48、4.49、8.35,P均<0.05);植入支架后患侧血管PS值、CBF、MTT与术前差异均有统计学意义(t=0.95、-4.05、3.50,P均<0.05)。血管PS与MTT、CBV分别呈高度、中度正相关(r=0.86、0.59,P均<0.05),与CBF呈低度负相关(r=-0.31,P<0.05)。结论血管PS可作为定量评价ICAS治疗效果的影像学标志物。ICAS患者患侧脑组织血管PS明显增加,植入支架后较术前明显降低。PS结合血流动力学参数能更准确地反映脑组织病理生理改变,为个性化治疗ICAS及评估疗效提供参考。 Objective To observe vascular permeability surface area product(PS)and hemodynamic status of brain tissue in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis(ICAS)and the changes after stent implantation with whole brain computed tomography perfusion(CTP).Methods Totally 59 patients with ICAS(implantation group)and 16 volunteers(control group)were collected.All subjects underwent whole brain CTP,and 17 ICAS patients among them underwent responsible vascular stent implantation.Quantitative analysis software was used to measure vascular PS,hemodynamic parameters(cerebral blood flow[CBF],cerebral blood volume[CBV]and mean transit time[MTT])in the responsible artery blood supply area,and the healthy side mirror values were obtained.The differences of vascular PS and hemodynamic parameters were compared between 2 groups.The changes of vascular PS and hemodynamic parameters before and after stent implantation in ICAS group and the correlations of vascular PS and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed.Results Compared with control group,ICAS group had higher vascular PS value,lower CBF and longer MTT(t=7.77,-4.84,7.47,all P<0.05).Compared with the healthy side,increased vascular PS value,decreased CBF,increased CBV and MTT were observed on the affected side in ICAS group(t=-4.38,-4.48,4.49,8.35,all P<0.05).After stent implantation,statistical differences of vascular PS value,CBF,MTT of the affected side were found compared with those before(t=0.95,-4.05,3.50,all P<0.05).There was slight negative correlation between PS value and atrial fibrillation(P<0.05).Vascular PS was highly and moderately positively correlated with MTT and CBV,respectively(r=0.86,0.59,both P<0.05),and negatively correlated with CBF(r=-0.31,P<0.05).Conclusion Vascular PS value can be used as an imaging marker to quantitatively evaluate the therapeutic effect of ICAS.Vascular PS value of the affected brain tissue of ICAS patients increased significantly,but significantly decreased after stent implantation.Vascular PS value combined with hemodynamic parameters can more accurately reflect the pathophysiological changes of brain tissue,therefore providing references for individualized treatment of ICAS and evaluation of efficacy.
作者 林澜 吕晋浩 张荣举 罗春材 马笑笑 韩东山 齐叶青 杨铁 田成林 王君 马林 娄昕 LIN Lan;LYU Jinhao;ZHANG Rongju;LUO Chuncai;MA Xiaoxiao;HAN Dongshan;QI Yeqing;YANG Tie;TIAN Chenglin;WANG Jun;MA Lin;LOU Xin(Department of Radiology,the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Neurology,the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of CT,Dongsheng People's Hospital,Ordos 017000,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期659-664,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81671126、81730048)。
关键词 颅内动脉硬化 血流动力学 血管 渗透 体层摄影术 X线计算机 intracranial arteriosclerosis hemodynamics blood vessels osmosis tomography X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. A novel, self-expan- ding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atheroscle- rotic stenoses: The Wingspan study. Stroke, 2007,38(5) : 1531- 1537.
  • 2Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus ag- gressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2011,365(11) :993-1003.
  • 3Abou-Chebl A, Steinmetz H. Critique of "Stenting versus aggres- sive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis" by Chi- mowitz et al in the new England Journal of Medicine. Stroke,2012,43(2):616-620.
  • 4Henkes H, Bazner H, Nelson PK. Comment on: Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis: Chi- mowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:993-1003. Clin Neuroradiol, 2011,21(4) :257-259.
  • 5Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, et al. Flow failure from in- tracranial atherosclerotic disease: A rationale for endovascular in- tervention in a population with reeurrent symptoms despite maxi- mal medical therapy. J Neurointerv Surg, 2013,5(4) : e17.
  • 6Tarr RW, Albuquerque F, Hirsh J, et al. The SAMMPRIS tri- al: The end or just the beginning. J Neurointerv Surg, 2011,3 (4) :310-311.
  • 7Liebeskind DS, Cotsonis GA, Saver JL, et al. Collaterals dra- matically alter stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerosis. Ann Neurol, 2011,69(6) :963-974.
  • 8Yamauchi H, Higashi T, Kagawa S, et al. Is misery perfusion still a predictor of stroke in symptomatic major cerebral artery dis- ease? Brain, 2012, 135(Pt 8) :2515-2526.
  • 9Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, et al. A standardized meth- od for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am .1 Neu- roradiol, 2000,21 (4) : 643-646.
  • 10Higashida RT, Meyers PM, Connors J J, et al. Intracranial an- gioplasty & stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis: A position statement of the American Society of Interventional and Thera- peutic Neuroradiology. Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neurora- diol, 2005,26(9) :2323-2327.

共引文献100

同被引文献58

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部