期刊文献+

加拿大高校学生学习成果评估的内容、方法及启示 被引量:2

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment in Canadian Higher Education Institutions:Contents,Methods and Enlightenments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为全球第二个实现高等教育普及化的高等教育强国,加拿大高校学生学习成果评估体系富有特色:在评估内容方面,构建起了高等教育系统、院校以及学科(专业)等不同层面的学生学习成果体系;在评估方法方面,形成了由标准化测试、评价量规、表现性评估以及问卷调查等四种类型构成的多元化学生学习成果评估方法体系。其对我国的启示是:构建和完善高校学生学习成果评估的内容体系,为学生学习成果评估奠定共识基础;开发多元化的学生学习成果评估方法与工具,提高评估活动的科学性;加强以结果为导向的评估制度建设,促使学习成果评估常态化。 As the second higher education power to popularize higher education in the world,Canada has the distinctive assessment system for student learning outcomes.In the aspect of assessment content,learning outcome is articulated at several levels,including system,institution and discipline/program.In the aspect of assessment method,diversified methodology system incorporating standardized tests,assessment rubrics,performance assessment,and questionnaire surveys have been formed.It enlightens that the content system of student learning outcomes should be constructed and improved to lay a consensus basis for the assessment.Diversified methods and tools should be further developed to enhance the scientific assessment.The outcome-based assessment system should be strengthened to normalize the evaluation of student learning outcomes.
作者 蒋家琼 郑惠文 龚慧云 JIANG Jia-qiong;ZHENG Hui-wen;GONG Hui-yun
出处 《大学教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期111-116,共6页 University Education Science
基金 教育部人文社科规划项目“基于成果导向的一流大学本科教学质量评价体系研究”(18YJA880034) 湖南省教育科学规划重点课题“基于学生学习产出导向的高校本科教学质量评价体系研究”(XJK18AGD008)。
关键词 加拿大 学习成果评估 高等教育质量评估 高等教育质量保障 Canada learning outcomes assessment quality evaluation of higher education quality assurance of higher education
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献44

  • 1周作宇,周廷勇.大学生就读经验:评价高等教育质量的一个新视角[J].大学(研究),2007(1):27-31. 被引量:74
  • 2董云川,徐娟.真正的“本科教学质量报告”在哪里?——对七所“985工程”高校教学质量报告的文本分析[J].上海教育评估研究,2013,2(1):28-34. 被引量:9
  • 3高书国.全球高等教育普及化进程分析[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(3):44-47. 被引量:9
  • 4Shavelson R. J. A Brief History of Student LearningAssessment : How We Got Where We Are and a Proposal for Where toGo Next [Z]. Washington D.C.: The Association of AmericanColleges and Universities, 2007.15-18.
  • 5American Council on Education. Public Accountability forStudent Learning in Higher Education : Issues and Options. TheBusiness Higher Education Forum. Washington, D.C. 2004[EB/OL]http : //www.bhef.com/publications/documents/public.accountability.04.pdf. 2009-06-07.
  • 6Hartle, T. W. The Growing Interest in Measuring theEducational Aevement of College Students [A]. Assessment inAmerican Higher Education: Issues and Contexts [C]. Office ofEducational Research and Improvement of U.S. Department ofEducation, 1985.8.
  • 7Hutngs, P. & Marchese, T. Watng Assessment :Questions, Stories, Prospects [J]. Change, 1990, (5).
  • 8Marchese, T. J. Third Down, Ten Years to Go [j]. AAHEBulletin, 1987,(4).
  • 9Bauer, K. W. Assessment for Institutional Research:Guidelines and Resources [A]. William E. Knight (Ed.) The Primerfor Institutional Research[C]. Association for Institutional Research.2003.9.
  • 10Terenzini P. T. Assessment with Open Eyes: Pitfalls inStudying Student Outcomes [j]. Journal of Higher Education. 1989,(6).

共引文献1022

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部