摘要
作为推动治理现代化的工具,技术治理的绩效在不同类型治理领域中存在较大差异。技术治理以信息量化、清晰预算和精细管理等工作机制,明显提升了行政体系在传统优势领域即小规模诊疗型治理中的能力。由于技术治理自身不能突破行政机构的内在缺陷,尤其是在行政体系传统弱势领域即大规模预防型治理事务中,并不能有效推进治理现代化。技术治理本身并不自带现代化属性,要推动治理现代化,必须抛弃技术治理自我合法化的谬误,并充分认识技术治理的内在缺陷和功能弱点。应当运用技术治理的手段,弥补行政科层制内在缺陷和功能弱势。技术治理的发展方向是寻求技术穿透社会的制度支撑,弥补政府治理缝隙,解决委托-代理难题,以及应对现代治理日益加剧的复杂性问题。
As instrument of governance modernization,technology governance effects differently for various types of public affairs.Based on its mechanism of quantification,calculation and delicacy management,technology governance increase administration’s capacity in its traditional strengthens,which is small scale-preventive governance.But technology governance itself is unable to break through structure of administration,thus it fails to support governance modernization in administration’s traditional weakness,especially large scale-treatment governance.Technology governance is not modern by its nature,thus to promote governance modernization,the fallacy of technology self-legitimization should be abandoned,the inherent defect and functional weakness should be convinced.Technology governance is to be utilized to overcome structure defects and functional weakness of administrative system.Technology governance needs to seek institutional support to break through modern society,to make-up governance gap,and to deal with principle-agent dilemma and increasing wicked problems.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期3-12,共10页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
技术治理
治理现代化
治理绩效
Technology Governance
Governance Modernization
Governance Performance