期刊文献+

技术治理的限度及其转型:治理现代化的视角 被引量:101

The Limit and Transition of Technology Governance:Perspective of Governance Modernization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为推动治理现代化的工具,技术治理的绩效在不同类型治理领域中存在较大差异。技术治理以信息量化、清晰预算和精细管理等工作机制,明显提升了行政体系在传统优势领域即小规模诊疗型治理中的能力。由于技术治理自身不能突破行政机构的内在缺陷,尤其是在行政体系传统弱势领域即大规模预防型治理事务中,并不能有效推进治理现代化。技术治理本身并不自带现代化属性,要推动治理现代化,必须抛弃技术治理自我合法化的谬误,并充分认识技术治理的内在缺陷和功能弱点。应当运用技术治理的手段,弥补行政科层制内在缺陷和功能弱势。技术治理的发展方向是寻求技术穿透社会的制度支撑,弥补政府治理缝隙,解决委托-代理难题,以及应对现代治理日益加剧的复杂性问题。 As instrument of governance modernization,technology governance effects differently for various types of public affairs.Based on its mechanism of quantification,calculation and delicacy management,technology governance increase administration’s capacity in its traditional strengthens,which is small scale-preventive governance.But technology governance itself is unable to break through structure of administration,thus it fails to support governance modernization in administration’s traditional weakness,especially large scale-treatment governance.Technology governance is not modern by its nature,thus to promote governance modernization,the fallacy of technology self-legitimization should be abandoned,the inherent defect and functional weakness should be convinced.Technology governance is to be utilized to overcome structure defects and functional weakness of administrative system.Technology governance needs to seek institutional support to break through modern society,to make-up governance gap,and to deal with principle-agent dilemma and increasing wicked problems.
作者 彭勃 Peng Bo
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期3-12,共10页 Journal of Social Sciences
关键词 技术治理 治理现代化 治理绩效 Technology Governance Governance Modernization Governance Performance
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

  • 1朱健刚,张来治.城市基层政治权力结构的变迁[J].探索与争鸣,1998(3):33-34. 被引量:8
  • 2邱泽奇.技术与组织的互构——以信息技术在制造企业的应用为例[J].社会学研究,2005(2):32-54. 被引量:195
  • 3布朗,杜德奎.信息的社会层面[M].王铁生,葛立成译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.134.
  • 4霍尔,理查德·H.[1995]2003.组织:结构、过程及结果[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社.
  • 5Heeks, Richard. 2001. Reinventing Government in the Information Age: Internotiond Practice in IT- enabled Public Sector Reform. New York: Routledge.
  • 6Horsley, Janie. 2004. "Shanghai Advanoes the Cause of Open Government Information in China. "Yale Law School, China Law Center, New Haven, Conneticut. http: //chinalaw. law. yale. edu/ shanghai _article. pdf.
  • 7Hughs,Thomas P. 1994. "Technological Momentum". in Does Techonlogy Drive History? edtited by Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx. London:MIT Press.
  • 8Lamoreaux, Naomi R. Daniel M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin. 2003. "Beyond markets and Hierarchies: Towards a New Syntheses of American Business History". American History Review 106(April ) http..// www. nebr. org/papers/w9029.
  • 9Motrton. 1996. " Procuct Policies in Two French Computer Firms: SEA and Bull. " in Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of knowledge in Modern Business, edited by Lisa Bud Friennan. London: Routledge Press.
  • 10诺斯,道格拉斯·C.2003.对制度的理解[G]//制度、契约与组织--从新制度经济学角度的透视.科斯、诺思、威廉姆森,编.北京:经济科学出版社.

共引文献300

同被引文献1713

引证文献101

二级引证文献642

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部