期刊文献+

米力农在治疗脓毒症伴心衰中的效果评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of Milinone in the Treatment of Sepsis with Heart Failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究了米力农在脓毒症伴心衰患者中的治疗效果。方法方便选取2016年5月-2019年4月该院收治的脓毒症患者60例,按照随机数字法分为对照组和观察组,各30例。对照组进行常规治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上使用米力农注射液。对两组患者治疗前后的心功能和NT-ProBNP水平变化进行比较,比较两组患者治疗后的APACHEⅡ评分、心功能改善情况、住院时间以及机械通气时间,比较两组患者治疗前后心肌酶及c TnⅠ水平的变化。结果治疗后,观察组心率(68.52±7.37)次/min vs (78.39±8.26)次/min、NT-ProBNP(1 316.26±175.53)pg/L vs (2231.54±184.15)pg/L水平明显低于对照组,LVEF水平明显高于对照组(54.82±10.13)%vs (49.12±9.34)%(t=3.544、6.231、2.941,P<0.05);APACHEⅡ评分明显低于对照组(9.87±2.82)分vs (14.36±3.15)分,住院时间(15.92±2.36)d vs(23.16±4.15)d、机械通气时间(2.23±1.12)d vs (4.51±1.42)d明显短于对照组,心功能改善率明显高于对照组(96.67%vs 70.00%)(t=3.819、3.011、4.184;χ~2=7.680,P<0.05);血清CK (89.56±17.49)IU/L vs (101.24±19.83)IU/L、cTnⅠ(0.74±0.22)mg/L vs (1.86±0.31)mg/L和CK-MB (34.62±6.51)IU/L vs (42.19±7.89)IU/L水平均明显低于对照组(t=2.996、5.103、4.212,P<0.05)。结论在常规治疗的基础上,使用米力农,能够明显降低脓毒症伴心衰患者的住院时间,改善心功能,减轻患者的心肌损伤程度。 Objective To study the therapeutic effect of milrinone in patients with sepsis and heart failure. Methods Convenient select 60 patients with sepsis treated in the hospital from May 2016 to April 2019 were enrolled, and they were divided into control group and observation group according to random number method, 30 cases each. The control group received conventional treatment, and the observation group used Milinone injection on the basis of the control group. The changes in cardiac function and NT-ProBNP levels before and after treatment were compared between the two groups of patients. The APACHE Ⅱ score, cardiac function improvement, hospital stay, and mechanical ventilation time were compared between the two groups of patients. Myocardial enzymes and cTnⅠ changes in level were compared before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the heart rate(68.52 ±7.37)tmes/min vs(78.39 ±8.26)tmes/min NT-ProBNP(1316.26±175.53)pg/L vs(2 231.54±184.15)pg/L were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group,and the LVEF level was significantly higher than that in the control group(54.82±10.13)% vs(49.12±9.34)%(t=3.544, 6.231,2.941, P<0.05);APACHEⅡ score was significantly lower than the control group(9.87±2.82)points vs(14.36±3.15)points hospital stay(15.92 ±2.36)d vs(23.16 ±4.15)d, and mechanical ventilation time(2.23 ±1.12)d vs(4.51 ±1.42)d was significantly shorter than the control group, and cardiac function improvement was significantly higher than the control group(96.67% vs 70.00%)(t=3.819, 3.011, 4.184, χ~2=7.680, P<0.05);serum CK(89.56±17.49)IU/L vs (101.24±19.83)IU/L,c TnⅠ(0.74±0.22)mg/L vs(1.86±0.31)mg/L and CK-MB(34.62±6.51)IU/L vs(42.19±7.89)IU/L were significantly lower than those in the control group(t =2.996,5.103,4.212, P <0.05). Conclusion On the basis of conventional treatment, using milrinone can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay of patients with sepsis and heart failure, improve cardiac function, and reduce the degree of myocardial damage in patients.
作者 卢险峰 王雄明 周春华 姜明明 LU Xian-feng;WANG Xiong-ming;ZHOU Chun-hua;JIANG Ming-ming(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Beijing Zhongguancun Hospital,Haidian District,Beijing,100190 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2020年第8期79-81,84,共4页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 米力农 脓毒症 心力衰竭 疗效 心功能 Milrinone Sepsis Heart failure Efficacy Heart function
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献123

  • 1谢洪智,朱文玲.重组人脑利钠肽和硝酸甘油治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭疗效和安全性的随机、开放、平行对照的多中心临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):222-226. 被引量:228
  • 2赵利军,董淑云,段国贤,张连元.氧化应激在大鼠肢体缺血/再灌注心肌损伤中的作用[J].解放军医学杂志,2006,31(8):802-803. 被引量:13
  • 3方雪玲,方强,蔡国龙,严静.液体复苏对重症脓毒症患者黏附分子及血流动力学的作用[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(9):539-541. 被引量:9
  • 4姚咏明,盛志勇,林洪远,柴家科.2001年国际脓毒症定义会议关于脓毒症诊断的新标准[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(11):645-645. 被引量:191
  • 5郑春霞,刘志红.血管内皮细胞损伤及其检测[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2007,16(1):64-69. 被引量:15
  • 6中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂在心血管疾病应用的专家共识[J].中华心血管病杂志,2009,37:195-209.
  • 7中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.慢性心力衰竭诊断治疗建议.中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(12):1076-1095.
  • 8Nieminen MS, Bohm M, Cowie MR, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: the Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26: 384-416.
  • 9Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of European Society of Cardiology. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 : the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC ( HFA ) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J, 2008, 29 : 2388-2442.
  • 10Hunt SA, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure ). ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart fa/lure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46: e1-e82.

共引文献1781

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部