期刊文献+

经阴道前盆底重建术联合骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析 被引量:1

Transvaginal Anterior Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Combined with Sacrospinal Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盆腔脏器脱垂实施经阴道前盆底重建术联合骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗的疗效。方法将妇科80例盆腔脏器脱垂患者(2017年1月—2018年6月间)纳入研究,使用计算机进行随机分组,分为悬吊组(实施骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗)、联合组(实施经阴道前盆底重建术联合骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗),各40例,分析患者手术指标、术后恢复指标、术后并发症、疗效、远期病情、生活质量、性生活质量及疾病复发状况。结果悬吊组患者手术出血量(55.6±7.2)mL、手术时间(55.6±6.4)min明显低于联合组的(75.3±8.5)mL、(70.5±7.6)min(t=11.185、9.484,P<0.05)。联合组术后并发症总发生率(5.0%)明显低于悬吊组(20.0%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.114,P<0.05)。联合组总有效率(97.5%)明显高于悬吊组(80.0%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.135,P<0.05)。悬吊组术后1年PFDI-20、PFIQ-7、PISQ-12评分为(22.5±6.2)分、(21.5±3.8)分、(35.6±3.5)分明显高于联合组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.069、6.887、6.935,P<0.05)。结论盆腔脏器脱垂实施经阴道前盆底重建术联合骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗效果良好,虽会增加手术出血,延长手术时间,但并发症少,恢复更快,远期预后良好,可改善生活质量及性生活质量,降低复发风险。 Objective To investigate the effect of transvaginal anterior pelvic floor reconstruction combined with sacrospinal ligament suspension in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Methods 80 gynecologic patients with pelvic organ prolapse(January 2017 to June 2018)were enrolled in the study.They were randomly divided into suspension group(sacrospinal ligament suspension therapy)and combination group(transvaginal anterior pelvic floor reconstruction combined with sacrospinal ligament suspension therapy),40 cases each.Indicators,post-operative recovery indicators,post-operative complications,efficacy,long-term condition,quality of life,quality of sexual life and disease recurrence.Results The bleeding volume and operation time of suspension group were(55.6±7.2)mL and(55.6±6.4)min respectively,which were significantly lower than those of combined group(75.3±8.5)mL,(70.5±7.6)min(t=11.185,9.484,P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the combined group(5.0%)was significantly lower than that in the suspension group(20.0%),with statistically significant differences(χ2=4.114,P<0.05).The total effective rate of the combined group(97.5%)was significantly higher than that of the suspension group(80.0%),with statistically significant differences(χ2=6.135,P<0.05).The one-year postoperative PFDI-20,PFIQ-7,and PISQ-12 scores in the suspension group were(22.5±6.2)points,(21.5±3.8)points,and(35.6±3.5)points,which were significantly higher than those in the combination group,with statistically significant differences(t=5.069,6.887,6.935,P<0.05).Conclusion Transvaginal anterior pelvic floor reconstruction combined with sacrospinal ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse has good therapeutic effect.Although it can increase bleeding and prolong operation time,it has fewer complications,quicker recovery and good long-term prognosis.It can improve the quality of life and sexual life and reduce the risk of recurrence.
作者 王彬 杨思丽 罗万训 WANG Bin;YANG Si-li;LUO Wan-xun(Department of Gynecology,Dali First People's Hospital,Dali,Yunnan Province,671000 China)
出处 《世界复合医学》 2020年第2期99-101,共3页 World Journal of Complex Medicine
关键词 盆腔脏器脱垂 经阴道前盆底重建术 骶棘韧带悬吊术 生活质量 性生活质量 Pelvic organ prolapse Transvaginal anterior pelvic floor reconstruction Sacrospinal ligament suspension Quality of life Quality of sexual life
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1梁志清,徐惠成,陈勇,熊光武,常青,张巧玉,何畏.腹腔镜下子宫骶骨韧带缩短固定术治疗子宫脱垂[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(10):666-668. 被引量:22
  • 2Elliott CS, Rhoads KF, Comiter CV, et al. Improving the accuracy of prolapse and incontinence procedure epidemiology by utilizing both inpatient and outpatient data [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(11):1939-1946. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-013-2115-z.
  • 3Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(11): 1445-1457. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1542-9.
  • 4Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)-a new era in pelvic prolapse staging[J]. J Med Life, 2011, 4(1):75-81.
  • 5Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, et al. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(9): 1305-1311.
  • 6Hyakutake MT, Cundiff GW, Geoffrion R. Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(6):851-854. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-013-2258-9.
  • 7Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 151(2):190-192. DOI: 10.10! 6/j.ejogrb.2010.03.031.
  • 8Costantini S, Mistrangelo E, Francioso R, et al. Vaginal versus transabdominal hysterectomy: is mode of hysterectomy to influence pelvic statics or is pelvic statics to influence mode of hysterectomy?[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(4): 376-379.
  • 9de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, et al. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester)versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2009, 20 (11 ): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0945-3.
  • 10Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang H J, et al. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift mesh[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26(7):1013-1020. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-015-2630-z.

共引文献119

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部