期刊文献+

高利贷以非法经营罪论处之适当性探讨

Discussion on the Appropriateness of Usury Charged with the Crime of Illegal Business Operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高利贷以是否具备经营性,可以区分为民间借贷型高利贷和营业型高利贷。民间借贷型高利贷是契约自由精神的体现,是双方自愿、合法的选择,宜以民法进行规制;营业型高利贷,背离民间借贷的本质属性,具备严重的社会危害性及刑事可罚性,无论是依同质性解释还是目的解释的路径,均符合非法经营罪兜底条款的要求。《关于办理非法放贷刑事案件若干问题的意见》中入罪的类型属营业型高利贷,其以非法经营罪论处,契合罪刑法定原则的根本要领。 Usury can be divided into private lending usury and commercial usury according to whether it is operating.Private lending usury is a manifestation of the spirit of freedom of contract.It is a voluntary and legal choice of both parties and should be regulated by civil law.While commercial usury deviates from the nature of private lending and has serious social hazards and criminal penalty,is in line with the requirements of the clauses of the crime of illegal business operation,whether based on homogeneity interpretation or purpose explanation.Therefore,the conviction type belongs to the commercial usury which punished by the crime of illegal business operation,is conform to the basic principles of the legal principle of criminal punishment.
作者 陈祖瀚 Chen Zuhan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200333)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2020年第1期58-63,68,共7页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词 营业型高利贷 民间借贷型高利贷 同质性解释 目的解释 非法经营罪 commercial usury private lending usury homogeneity interpretation purpose explanation crime of illegal business operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部