期刊文献+

窗宽和层厚在COVID-19磨玻璃征象中的诊断价值 被引量:1

Diagnostic value of window width and slice thickness in ground glass opacity of COVID-19
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨并筛选适合观察新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)中磨玻璃影及各征象的最佳窗宽及层厚设置方案。方法:回顾性分析11例COVID-19患者的影像资料,分别选取30个磨玻璃影、铺路石征、血管影增粗及空气支气管征的COVID-19病灶进行分析对照,两名具有15年以上诊断经验的胸部影像医生对固定窗位下不同窗宽及层厚下的磨玻璃影及其他各征象的显示程度进行主观评分,得出图像质量评分。结果:对磨玻璃影显示为3分的占比最大的窗宽值为1000 HU(76.7%),对铺路石征显示为3分的占比最大的窗宽值为1400 HU(80.0%),对血管影增粗显示为3分的占比最大的窗宽值为1400 HU(83.3%),对空气支气管征显示为3分的占比最大的窗宽值为1000 HU(83.3%),以上结果与其他窗宽组的显示结果比较均具有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。对磨玻璃影、铺路石征、血管影增粗及空气支气管征显示为3分的占比最多的层厚均为1mm(100%);与其他层厚组比较,差异均具有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:在COVID-19的影像诊断过程中,1000 HU是观察磨玻璃影及空气支气管征的最佳窗宽值,1400 HU是观察铺路石征及血管影增粗的最佳窗宽值;1 mm是观察磨玻璃影及各征象的最佳层厚值。 Objective To explore and select the best setting scheme of window width and slice thickness which is suitable for observing the ground glass opacity and various signs of corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19).Methods The imaging data of11 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed retrospectively;and 30 COVID-19 lesions with ground glass opacity,paving stone sign,vascular thickening and air bronchogram sign were selected for analysis and comparison.The display degrees of ground glass opacity and the other signs under different window widths and slice thicknesses at the fixed window level were subjectively scored by two chest imaging doctors with more than 15 years of diagnostic experience for obtaining the image quality score.Results The window widths with the highest percentage for the ground glass opacity with a score of 3,the paving stone sign with a score of3,vascular thickening with a score of 3 and air bronchogram sign with a score of 3 were 1000 HU(76.7%),1400 HU(80.0%),1400 HU(83.3%)and 1000 HU(83.3%),respectively,and there were statistical differences between the above results and those in other groups(P<0.001).For the signs(ground glass opacity,paving stone sign and vascular thickening and air bronchogram sign)with the highest score,the slice thickness with the highest proportion was 1 mm(100%),and the results were significantly different from those in other groups(P<0.001).Conclusion During the imaging diagnosis of COVID-19,the best window width for observing ground glass opacity and air bronchogram sign is 1000 HU,and that for observing paving stone sign and vascular thickening is 1400 HU.Moreover,1 mm is the best slice thickness for observing ground glass opacity and various signs.
作者 邓靓娜 张斌 蒋健 林晓强 韩涛 景梦园 周俊林 DENG Liangna;ZHANG Bin;JIANG Jian;LIN Xiaoqiang;HAN Tao;JING Mengyuan;ZHOU Junlin(Department of Radiology,Lanzhou University Second Hospital,Lanzhou 730030,China;Second School of Clinical Medicine,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging in Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730030,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2020年第5期619-624,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 兰州市人才创业创新项目(2016-RC-58)。
关键词 COVID-19 窗宽 层厚 磨玻璃影 高分辨率CT COVID-19 window width slice thickness ground glass opacity high-resolution computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1龚拥军.CT窗技术的应用[J].现代医用影像学,2005,14(1):26-28. 被引量:12
  • 2Paranjpe DV,Bergin CJ.Spiral CT of the lungs:optimal technique and resolution compared with conventional CT[J].AJR,1994,162:561-567.
  • 3Fischbach F,Knollmann F,Griesshaber V.et al.Detection of pulmonary nodules by muitislice computed tomography:improved detection rate weth reduced slice thickness.[J].Eur Radiol,2003,13(10):2378-2383.
  • 4[1]Hu H, He HD, Foley WD,et al. Four multidector-row spiral CT: Image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology, 2000, 215:55
  • 5[2]Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN,et al. Aorta and iliac arteries: Single versus multiple detector-row spiral CT angiography. Radiology, 2000, 215:670
  • 6[3]Reynolds DM, Hazle JD, Johnston DA,et al. Evaluation of helical computed tomography scan for vascular imaging. Med Phys, 1998, 25:176
  • 7[4]Provenzale JM, Beauchamp NJ Jr. Recent advances in imaging of cerebrovascular disease. Radiologic Clinics of North America Volume, 1999, 37:467
  • 8[5]Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Lucas C,et al. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. Radiology, 1999, 210:673
  • 9[6]Verhoek G, Costello P, Khoo EW,et al. Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: Assessment of interactive volume rendering. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999, 23:590
  • 10[7]Brink JA, Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 1995, 33:825

共引文献2579

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部