期刊文献+

我国反垄断法宽恕制度的问题与对策探究 被引量:1

THE PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES OF ANTI MONOPOLY LAW FORGIVENESS SYSTEM IN CHINA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宽恕政策是反垄断执法过程中有助于从内部瓦解垄断协议的一项重要制度,但反思我国相关的立法现状与执法实践,在申请主体与减免幅度、减免数量三个方面存在着制度供给不足、执法裁量权过大、执法标准混乱等缺陷。借鉴域外关于反垄断宽恕政策的相关规定,建立我国的双主体受罚制,并在此基础上规定个人宽恕制度,另外限定可申请减免的主体数量与限缩现有关于减免幅度的规定,对于完善我国反垄断宽恕制度的实践与应用具有重要的现实意义。 Forgiveness policy is an important system that helps to disrupt the monopoly agreement from within the anti-monopoly law enforcement process.However,reflecting on China’s relevant system stock and law enforcement practice,in three aspects of the applicant,the scope of reduction and exemption and the amount of reduction and exemption,there are shortcomings such as insufficient supply of the system and excessive discretion of law enforcement.Drawing on the relevant provisions of the anti-monopoly forgiveness policy outside the territory,a dual-subject punishment system will be established in China.On this basis,the personal forgiveness system is defined.In addition,limiting the number of subjects that can apply for exemption and changing the existing provisions on the scope of exemption have important practical significance for improving the practice and application of anti-monopoly forgiveness system in China.
作者 张三石 刘清泉 ZHANG San-shi;LIU Qing-quan(Sichuan university,college of law,Chengdu 610207,China)
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《南阳理工学院学报》 2020年第1期58-62,共5页 Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基金 四川大学法学院2018年研究生科研创新项目(0010204117001)。
关键词 反垄断 宽恕制度 申请主体 减免幅度 减免数量 anti-monopoly forgiveness system applicant the scope of exemption quantity of exemption
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献93

  • 1张晨颖.论卡特尔赦免制度原理——兼议我国《反垄断法》第46条之适用[J].清华法学,2008,2(1):66-77. 被引量:10
  • 2吕志强,龚乐凡,尹玲英,王凌.中国经济特区法律移植研究[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1994,16(6):3-10. 被引量:6
  • 3戴维·杜鲁贝克,王力威,潘汉典.论当代美国的法律与发展运动(上)[J].比较法研究,1990,4(2):46-53. 被引量:48
  • 4阿兰.沃森,贺卫方.法律移植论[J].比较法研究,1989,3(1):61-65. 被引量:91
  • 5[法]保罗·利科.论公正[M].程春明译.北京:法律出版社,2007.122.
  • 6Eberhard Feess & Markus Walzl, Corporate Leniency Programs in the EU and the USA, German Working Paper in Law and Economics Volume 2003, Paper 24, February 13,2003.
  • 7Karine Brasset & Lionel Thomas , Leniency Program - A New Tool in Competition Policy to Deter Cartel Activity in Procurement Auctions, European Journal of Law and Economics, Volume 17, Number 1,2004.
  • 8Jeroen Hinloopen, An Economic Analysis of Leniency Programs in Antitrust Law, De Economist, Volume 151, Number 4,2003.
  • 9Massimo Motta & Michele Polo, Leniency Programs and Catel Prosecution, IGIER Working Paper No. 150, May 1999.
  • 10郭奇.反垄断法上宽恕制度的探析[M]//中国法学会经济法学研究会年会论文集,2007.

共引文献158

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部