公共服务视野下的城市空间正义问题--以山东省Q市为例

URBAN SPATIAL JUSTICE EVIDENCED BY CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH PUBLIC SERVICES IN SHANDONG PROVINCE

以山东省Q市为例,从公共服务满意度视角探讨城市空间正义问题及其作用路径。研究发现,近年来我国城市存在公共服务视野下明显的空间不正义问题,临近省市政府能享受更多、更好的公共服务,而区政府并不显著,且远离政府权力中心的边缘地带更加严重。不过,这种空间不正义问题更多源自省市政府权力的空间资源配置失衡,区政府没有足够话语权;主要在市辖区层面,街道尺度并不显著。受制于公共产品属性不同,不同公共服务的空间不正义问题有明显差异,弱排他性或弱竞争性的问题较小。另外,权力空间化通过公共产品配置数量和质量影响空间不正义问题,且质量层面远大于数量层面。新时代城市要从提高公共产品质量入手实现空间正义。

China’s urbanization process has achieved great development achievements, but it has also caused spatial injustices such as conflict, fragmentation and isolation in urban space, which directly affect social issues such as imbalance in public services. In case of Jinan in Shandong, the paper used the ordered data regression to explores the problem of urban spatial justice under the public service dimension and its affect path from the perspective of public service satisfaction. The results show that there are obvious spatial injustices in the perspective of public services in China in recent years, and near by the provincial and municipal power centers, except the district government, can enjoy more, better and more satisfactory public services,and spatial margins far away from political power center are getting worse. Second, only the street where the local government is located is obviously better in employment services than the surrounding streets, and the distance from the district government’s resident will not significantly affect the satisfaction and sense of public service of any residents. Third, the problem of urban spatial injustice is mainly reflected in the types of public services such as education, transportation, medical care, daily consumption, and leisure. Lastly, the power spatiality can affect the spatial injustice in the perspective of public services through the quantity and the quality of public goods, and the quality level is more restrictive than the quantity level.