期刊文献+

学习率的心理现实性及其对项目选择的影响 被引量:2

The Psychological Reality of the Rate of Learning and Its Impact on Item Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 项目选择一直是元认知控制研究中的热点问题。本研究以不同难度和分值的计算题为实验材料,通过两个实验探讨学习率的心理现实性及其对项目选择的影响。实验1中,在不限时条件下,被试者需要完成不同难度的计算题并赋予不同分值。实验2中,在限时条件下,通过变化计算题的难度和分值设计了三种不同学习率的项目,被试只能选择其中一种项目来计算以获得更高的分值。研究表明:第一,当项目所用时间增多时,被试对该项目所赋分值就增大,而时间(难度)与分值的比例是不变的,即学习率是相同的;第二,被试倾向于选择学习率更高的项目来完成计算任务,而当学习率相同时,被试倾向于优先选择高分困难项目。研究证实了学习率的心理现实性,并确定了学习率是项目选择的主要依据。 Item selection is one of the hot issues in metacognitive control.In the present study,the experimental materials were composed of calculation questions with different scores and difficulty.Two experiments were conducted to explore the psychological reality of the rate of learning(ROL)and its impact on item selection.In Experiment 1,under the condition of unlimited-time,participants were asked to complete calculation questions with different difficulty and then assigned scores.In Experiment 2,the ROL of the items was set by changing the difficulty and score.The participants were asked to calculate the items to get more scores within a limited time.The results showed that:1)The longer the calculation time was,the higher the score of the item was.However,the ratio of time(difficulty)and score was not change,that is,the ROL was consistent.2)The participants tended to choose the items with higher ROL to calculate.When the ROL was the same,items with higher scores and more difficult were preferred.In sum,the results confirm the psychological reality of ROL and indicate that ROL is the main basis of item selection.
作者 贾宁 刘伟 代景华 JIA Ning;LIU Wei;DAI Jinghua(College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024;Hebei University of Chinese Medicine,Shijiazuang 050200)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期255-260,267,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 河北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(QN2018152)。
关键词 学习率 心理现实性 项目选择 rate of learning psychological reality item selection.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献94

  • 1李晓明,傅小兰.情绪性权衡困难下的决策行为[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):801-808. 被引量:14
  • 2DunloSky, J., & Hertzog, C. Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In: D.J. Hacker,J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser. (Eds.). Meracognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum, 1998:249- 275
  • 3Metcalfe,J. & Kornell,N. A region of proximal learning model of study rime allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 2005,52 : 463 - 477
  • 4Metcalfe, J. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2002,131 : 349 - 363
  • 5Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2003,132:530 - 542
  • 6Thiede,K. W. , & Dunlosky, J. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1999,25: 1024- 1037
  • 7Dunlosky, J., & Connor, L. T. Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 1997,25:691 - 700
  • 8Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 1997,52 : 178 - 186
  • 9Son, L. K. , & Mercalfe, J. Metacognirive and Control strategies in study-rime allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000,26 (1) :204- 221
  • 10Dunlosky,J., & Thiede, K.W. What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychological, 1998,98(1) : 37- 56

共引文献28

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部