期刊文献+

沪陕传染病领域提出公共卫生问题干预措施的程度研究 被引量:1

Study on the degree of public health intervention measure issues in the field of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]综合评价沪陕两地传染病领域提出公共卫生问题干预措施的程度,分析两地异同,并探索其与甲、乙类法定报告传染病发病率的相关性。[方法]系统收集沪陕传染病信息系统的所有政策和文献并进行量化,运用Spearman相关分析和单因素线性回归分析,分析提出问题干预措施的程度与传染病发病率的关系。[结果]2000-2017年,沪陕两地提出问题干预措施的程分别由2000年的1.40%、0.00%提升到2017年的25.87%、35.71%,与传染病发病率的相关系数分别为-0.810、-0.646(P<0.01),对传染病发病率的解释程度分别为65.30%和34.90%。[结论]陕西省提出问题干预措施的程度高于上海市。两地提出干预措施的程度与传染病发病率呈负相关,提出问题干预措施的程度越高,对传染病的控制作用越显著。两地仍需继续提高提出问题干预措施的程度。 Objective To comprehensively evaluate the degree of proposing interventions on public health issues in the field of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi,analyze the similarities and differences in the two places,and explore the correlation between the degree and the incidence of infectious diseases.Methods It collected all policies and literatures of Shanghai and Shaanxi infectious disease information system and conducted quantization.Spearman correlation analysis and single factor linear-regression analysis were analyzed the relationship between the degree of proposing public health interventions and the incidence of infectious diseases.Results From 2000 to 2017,the degree of proposing public health interventions in Shanghai and Shaanxi increased from 1.40%and 0.00%in 2000 to 25.87%and 35.71%2017,the correlation coefficients with the incidence of infectious diseases was-0.840 and-0.646 respectively(P<0.01).The degree of interpretation in two regions was 65.30%and 34.90%respectively.Conclusions The degree of proposing interventions on public health issues in Shaanxi is higher than that in Shanghai.The degree of proposing interventions on public health issues has negative correlation with the incidence of infectious diseases,indicates that the higher the degree of proposing interventions on public health issues,the more significant the control effect on infectious diseases.Both regions should continue to strengthen the degree of proposing interventions on public health issues.
作者 王亚丽 李耀祖 景翔 焦安安 于芳 蒲川 沈群红 陈任 于明珠 吴群红 李程跃 徐凌忠 WANG Ya-li;LI Yao-zu;JING Xiang;JIAO An-an;YU Fang;PU Chuan;SHEN Qun-hong;CHEN Ren;YU Ming-zhu;WU Qun-hong;LI Cheng-yue;XU Ling-zhong(School of Public Health,Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250012,China;Shandong University Center for Health Economics Experiment and Public Policy Research,Jinan Shandong 250012,China;Public Health and Management School of Weifang Medical University,Weifang Shandong 261053,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health,Shanghai 200032,China;School of and Management,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China;School of Public Policy and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Health Management,Anhui Medical University,Hefei Anhui 230032,China;Disease Control and Prevention Branch of China Association of Health Promotion and Education,Shanghai 201821,China;School of Public Health,Harbin Medical University,Harbin Heilongjiang 150081,China;Research Institute of Health Development Strategies,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)
出处 《卫生软科学》 2020年第6期70-73,共4页 Soft Science of Health
基金 国家自然科学基金(71673169、71673170) 上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2015年-2017年)项目:现代化国际大都市的公共卫生体系建设(GWIV-32)。
关键词 传染病 公共卫生 干预措施的程度 发病率 上海 陕西 infectious disease public health degree of intervention measures incidence Shanghai Shanxi
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献84

共引文献280

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部