期刊文献+

阅读障碍诊断的成分模型与差异模型的比较研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study of the Component Model and the Discrepancy Model in the Diagnosis of Reading Disability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对上海市一所小学624名学生进行阅读障碍的成分模型诊断和差异模型诊断,并将两次诊断结果进行对比分析。研究发现:采用成分模型,阅读障碍者检出率为9.94%,其中,单词识别障碍、普通认知缺陷、阅读理解障碍三种亚类型的检出率分别为3.37%、0.64%和5.93%;差异模型的阅读障碍者检出率为9.94%;成分模型不存在检出率过高的现象;成分模型与差异模型诊断重合率为27.42%。 A total of 624 students from a primary school in Shanghai were tested by the component model and the discrepancy model, and the two diagnosis results were compared and analyzed. The results showed the detection rate of dyslexia in the component model was 9.94%. The detection rates of the word recognition disability type, the common cognitive defects types and the reading comprehension disability type were 3.37%, 0.64% and 5.93% respectively. The detection rate of dyslexia in the discrepancy model was 9.94%. There was no excessive detection rate in the component model. The coincidence rate of the component model and the discrepancy model was 27.42%.
作者 苏林阳 严晓芬 卢海丹 SU Linyang;YAN Xiaofen;LU Haidan(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062)
出处 《现代特殊教育》 2020年第4期72-77,共6页 Modern Special Education
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目“学习困难儿童视听通道注意瞬脱特征及其干预策略研究”(B1602) 国家社会科学青年项目“阅读障碍儿童听觉信号处理能力及训练策略研究”(CBA160183)成果.
关键词 阅读障碍 成分模型 差异模型 诊断 reading disability the Component Model the Discrepancy Model diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献227

共引文献169

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部