期刊文献+

英国高等教育政策制定与实施中的权力博弈——基于批判话语分析的视角 被引量:3

The Power Game in the Formulation and Implementation of British Higher Education Policies--From the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 英国高等教育具有良好的国际声誉,这与其顺时施宜的教育政策密不可分。基于批判话语分析的视角对英国高等教育政策的文本特征以及政策制定、实施过程进行系统梳理,发现其政策文本擅于使用被动语态隐藏权力主体、运用名词化结构增强文本权威性、利用情态动词明确权责划分。并且,不同时期的法案在政策内容的生产、分配以及消费方面都体现出政策话语与政治话语、民间话语间的明显互文。在此过程中,不同利益群体共同参与高等教育话语权的争夺,在相互的抗衡与妥协中构建合理的话语秩序。 British higher education has a good international reputation,which is closely related to its timely education policy.From the perspective of critical discourse analysis,the text features of British higher education policy as well as the process of policy formulation and implementation are systematically analyzed.It is found that British higher education policy texts are good at using passive voice to hide the power subject,employing nominalization to enhance the authority of policies,and utilizing modal verbs to clarify the division of rights and responsibilities.Moreover,in terms of production,distribution and consumption of policy contents,acts in different periods all showed obvious intertextuality between policy discourse,political discourse and folk discourse.In this process,different interest groups participate in the struggle for the discourse power of higher education,and construct a reasonable discourse order in the mutual confrontation and compromise.
作者 刘浩 LIU Hao(Faculty of Education,Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane QLD4059)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期20-26,共7页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 英国 高等教育政策 政策文本 话语分析 the United Kingdom higher education policy policy texts discourse analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献121

  • 1杨丰宁.名词化现象及其原因[J].外语教学,1996,17(3):53-57. 被引量:8
  • 2张新红.文本类型与法律文本[J].现代外语,2001,24(2):192-200. 被引量:67
  • 3肖建安,王志军.名物化结构的功能及变体特征[J].外语与外语教学,2001(6):9-11. 被引量:49
  • 4肖宝华,孔凡英.浅析法律语言[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2005,6(1):89-92. 被引量:4
  • 5埃德蒙·金.别国的学校和我们的学校—今日比较教育[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001..
  • 6Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics [ M ]. London : Verso, 1985.
  • 7Reed, M. The limits of discourse analysis in organisational analysis[J]. Organisation, 2000, (7).
  • 8Philips, L., Jorgensen, M.W.Discourse analysis: As theory and method [ M ]. London : Sage, 2004.
  • 9Fairclough, N.Critieal discourse analysis, organisational discourse, and organisational change [ J ] .Organization Studies, 2005, (6).
  • 10Chouliaraki, L.and Fairclough, N.Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis [M]. Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.

共引文献519

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部