期刊文献+

计算机交互式评价的开发研究——以科学探究为例 被引量:4

Development of computer-based interactive assessment:the case of science inquiry
原文传递
导出
摘要 计算机交互式评价以计算机模拟的形式呈现学科知识及其系统结构,并支持新颖的交互形式。评价学生的科学探究能力不仅需要创设丰富的任务情境,同时也要收集和分析学生的行为和作答数据。鉴于交互式评价与科学探究评价的契合性,文章基于以证据为中心(Evidence-Centered Design,ECD)的评价设计理念,解析了交互式科学探究评价的设计流程。首先,介绍了评价设计的理论基础--ECD框架。其次,结合科学探究评价的典型研究项目,以评价设计流程的任务分析、任务创设和数据分析为主线,总结了任务分析的领域信息来源、任务情境标准、任务创设的界面形式、学生作品和系统响应,以及数据分析中使用的多种数学模型。最后,讨论了交互式评价在评价的标准、实用性、非认知因素以及协同开发等方面应关注的问题和未来的发展方向,旨在丰富我国有关交互式评价开发的理论和实践研究。 Computer-based interactive assessment presents subject knowledge and its organization structure in the form of computer simulation,enabling innovative forms of interaction.The assessment of student science inquiry competency involves not only designing task-based scenarios but also collecting and analyzing data concerning student behavior and task completion.It is argued that computer-based interactive assessment is a tool fit for this purpose.After introducing the ECD approach,the study uses a science inquiry project as a case study to deconstruct the process of interactive assessment for science inquiry competency in terms of learning objectives(tasks to be completed),task design and data analysis.It also discusses assessment criteria,functionality,non-cognitive factors and co-development as well as directions for future research.
作者 李菲茗 张浩 林丽娟 黄怡 Feiming Li;Hao Zhang;Lijuan Lin;Yi Huang
出处 《中国远程教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期29-37,77,共10页 Chinese Journal of Distance Education
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目“基于计算机模拟的交互式科学探究测评的开发和研究”(项目编号:LY20C0900002) 国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于潜变分析的动态认知诊断研究”(项目编号:31600908)资助。
关键词 ECD 计算机交互式评价 过程性数据 科学探究 任务分析 任务创设 数据分析 evidence-centered design(ECD) computer-based interactive assessment process data science inquiry task analysis task scenario data analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献87

  • 1Mislevy, RJ., Steinberg, L.S. & Almond, R.G. Evidence-cen- tered assessment design [R]. Educational Testing Service, December 4, 1999. http ://www.education.umd.edu/EDMS/mislevy/papers/EC D_overview. html.
  • 2Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., & Lukas, J.F. A brief introduc- tion to evidence-centered design [R]. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service (ETS), 2003, Research Report 03-16.
  • 3Mislevy, R.J., & Riconscente, M. Evidence-centered assess- ment design: layers, structures, and terminology [R]. PADI Technology Report 9, CA: SRI International. 2005.
  • 4Mislevy, R.J., & Haertel, G.D. Implications of evidence-cen- tered design for educational testing [J]. Educational Measurement: Is- sues and Practice, 2006, 25(4): 6-20.
  • 5Mislevy, R.J. Evidence and inference in educational assess- ment [J]. Psychometrika, 1994( 12): 341-369.
  • 6Gulliksen, H. Measurement of learning and mental abilities [J]. Psychometrika, 1961 (26) : 93-107.
  • 7Lewis, C. Test theory and psychometrika: the past twenty-five years [J]. Psychometrika, 1986(51 ): 11-22.
  • 8Mislevy, R.J. How cognitive science challenges the educational measurement tradition [J]. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2008, 6(1-2) : 124.
  • 9Missick, S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assess ments [J]. Education Researcher, 1994,23(2): 13-23.
  • 10Mislevy, R.J., & Riconscente, M. Evidence-centered assess- ment design: layers, structures, and terminology [R]. CA: SRI Inter- national.2005 : 6.

共引文献1329

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部