期刊文献+

不同方式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效分析 被引量:7

Analysis of clinical efficacy of different ways of tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究不同方式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效。方法:2017年12月-2019年3月收治腹股沟疝气患者60例,随机分给两组,各30例。A组实施充填式无张力疝修补术治疗;B组实施平片无张力疝修补术治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:B组治疗总有效率显著高于A组,且B组各项手术指标水平及并发症发生率显著低于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:平片无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效优于充填式无张力疝修补术,且安全性更高。 Objective:To study the clinical efficacy of different ways of tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia.Methods:From December 2017 to March 2019,60 patients with inguinal hernia were enrolled,they were randomly divided into two groups with 30 cases in each group.Group A was treated with filling tension-free hernia repair.Group B was treated with plain film tension-free hernia repair.The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of treatment in group B was significantly higher than group A,the levels of surgical indicators and the incidence of complications were significantly lower than group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of plain film tension-free hernia repair is better than filling tension-free hernia repair and its safety is higher.
作者 胡阳 Hu Yang(The Community Health Service Centre of Development Zone,Xinghua City,Jiangsu Taizhou 225700)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2020年第15期73-73,75,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 无张力疝修补术 腹股沟疝气 疗效 Tension-free hernia repair Inguinal hernia Efficacy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献13

共引文献12

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部