期刊文献+

不同剂量地佐辛抑制鼻道手术麻醉复苏期的不良反应分析及比较

Analysis and comparison of adverse reactions of different doses of dizoxin in inhibition of anesthetic resuscitation in nasal meatus surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同剂量地佐辛抑制鼻道手术麻醉复苏期不良反应的效果。方法:2018年1月-2019年7月收治鼻道手术患者80例,随机分为两组,各40例。常规组术前给予低剂量地佐辛;试验组术前给予高剂量地佐辛。比较两组患者呼之睁眼时间、拔管时间、咳嗽评分、疼痛评分、焦虑评分。结果:试验组呼之睁眼时间、拔管时间、咳嗽评分均显著优于常规组,试验组疼痛评分、焦虑评分均显著低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:术前给予鼻道手术患者高剂量地佐辛,可有效降低麻醉复苏期不良反应风险。 Objective:To investigate the effect of different doses of dizoxin on adverse reactions during anesthetic resuscitation in nasal meatus surgery.Methods:From January 2018 to July 2019,80 patients with nasal meatus surgery were selected,they were randomly divided into the two groups with 40 cases in each group.The routine group was given low dose of dizosin before operation.The experimental group was given high dose of dizosin before operation.The call time to open eyes,extubation time,cough score,pain score and anxiety score were compared between the two groups.Results:The call time to open eyes,extubation time and cough score of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the routine group,the pain score and anxiety score of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the routine group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Preoperative administration of high dose of dizoxin in patients undergoing nasal meatus surgery can effectively reduce the risk of adverse reactions during anesthetic resuscitation.
作者 魏稼黎 Wei Jiali(Changsha Central Hospital,Hunan Changsha 410004)
机构地区 长沙市中心医院
出处 《中国社区医师》 2020年第15期82-82,84,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 鼻道手术 麻醉复苏期 地佐辛 不良反应 Nasal meatus surgery Anesthetic resuscitation Dizoxin Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献46

  • 1周家影,赖妙银,周玉静.地佐辛预防全身麻醉苏醒期患者躁动的临床观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(30):208-208. 被引量:1
  • 2邓立琴,丁风兰,刘红.全麻术后躁动225例分析[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(2):165-167. 被引量:291
  • 3林娜,李丽,李天佐,张炳熙.功能性鼻内镜手术后疼痛的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(3):239-240. 被引量:18
  • 4CRAVERO J, SURGENOR S, WHALEN K. Emergence agitationin paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery :A comparison with halothane[ J]. Pediatr Anesth, 2000,10(4):419-424.
  • 5AKSU R,AKIN A,BICER C,et al. Comparison of the effects ofdexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemody-namic responses to tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty : A doub-le -blind randomized,controlled study [ J ]. Curr Ther Res,2009’ 70(3) : 209 -220.
  • 6ROSOW C E. An overview of remifentanil [ J]. Anesth Analg,1999,89(4 Suppl) : SI - S3.
  • 7HANSEN E G,DUEDAHL T H,ROMSING J,et al. Intra - oper-ative remifentanil might influence pain levels in the immediate post -operative period after major abdominal surger [ J ]. Acta AnaesthesiolScand, 2005, 49(10) : 1464 - 1470.
  • 8Brown E N, Lydic R, Schiff N D. General anesthesia sleep, and coma [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2010,363 (27) 2638 -2650.
  • 9Sun Q, Zhou W, Wu B, et al. Dezocine: a novel drug to prevent fentanyl-indueed cough during general anesthesia induction? [J].J Anesth, 2012,26(3) :470.
  • 10Aksu R, Akin A, Bieer C, et al. Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on airway re- flexes and hemodynamie responses to tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty: A double-blind, randomized, con- trolled study[ J]. Curt Ther Res Clin Exp, 2009,70( 3 ) : 209 -220.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部