期刊文献+

基于CiteSpace的国内外企业社会责任缺失研究可视化对比分析 被引量:8

Visualization Analyses of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Researches at Home VS.Abroad Based on CiteSpace
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业社会责任缺失是一种并非非法但可能伤害到利益相关者而企业并没有采取必要措施给予纠正的行为,它普遍存在却往往被忽视。笔者运用CiteSpace对国内外企业社会责任缺失研究成果进行可视化对比,探讨该领域研究的热点演变规律及发展趋势,为进一步的深化与拓展研究提供有益的参考。研究结果显示:国内有关研究主题更注重利益相关者、食品安全、企业公民等,而国外的有关研究则更聚焦于所有者控制、惩罚性意图、劳资关系、公司绩效等社会责任缺失行为方面;关于未来的研究趋势问题,国内学者倾向于食品安全和财务绩效视角,而国外同行则更关注利益相关者理论、伦理、观点、治理、信息、跨国贸易等方面,二者都将利益相关者的反应及企业社会责任缺失的治理作为未来研究的重点。笔者认为:企业社会责任缺失研究应重视从利益相关者视角进行多元化探索,在管理实际中不能因为这种行为“并非非法”就放任自流,任其伤害利益相关者。 Corporate social irresponsibility(CSI)is a legal but harmful behavior which is common and often ignored by the enterprise and stakeholders.In this work the authors use CiteSpaceto visually compare existing literature of studies on CSI,and discuss the trend and development of frontier research in this field in order to provide useful reference for future research.The authors show that domestic researchers pay more attention to stakeholders,food safety,corporate citizens,etc.,while foreign researchers focus more on ownership control,punitive intent,laborrelations,corporate performance and other aspects of social irresponsibility behavior.On the issue of future research direction,domestic scholars tend to focus on the perspective from food safety and financial performance,while foreign researchers are more interested in the theory of stakeholder benefits,ethics,opinions,management,information,international trade and so on.Nevertheless,both regard the reaction of stakeholders and the governance of CSI as the center of interest of future research.In the authors'opinion,the study of CSI should focus on exploring diversification from the perspective of stakeholders.In practice,such behavior should not be allowed to harm stakeholders simply because it is“not illegal”.
作者 张爱卿 高应蓓 ZHANG Ai-qing;GAO Ying-bei
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期91-104,共14页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 中央财经大学重大科研课题培育项目“中国企业的社会责任及其效果理论创新研究”(项目编号:14ZZD007)。
关键词 企业社会责任缺失 文献计量 可视化 比较分析 Corporate social irresponsibility Bibliometrics Visualiztion Comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. 被引量:7385
  • 2Anand V, et al. Business as usual:The acceptance and perpetua- tion of corruption in organizations[J]. Academy of Manage- ment Executive, 2004, 18(2):39- 53.
  • 3Armstrong S J. Social irresponsibility in management [J]. Journal of Business Research, 1977, 5(3) : 185-213.
  • 4Armstrong R W, et al. The impact of banality, risky shift and escalating commitment on ethical decision rnaking[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 53(4):365-370.
  • 5Ashkanasy N M, et al. Bad apples in bad barrels revisited:Cogni-tive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethi- cal decision-making[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2006, 16 (4) :449-473.
  • 6Balch D and Armstrong R. Ethical marginality: The Icarus synd- rome and banality of wrongdoing[J]. Journal of Business Eth- ics, 2010, 92(2):291-303.
  • 7Barsky A. Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior[J]. Journal of Busi- ness Ethics, 2011, 104(1):59-75.
  • 8Baucus M S and Near J P. Can illegal corporate behavior be predic ted? An event history analysis[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(1):9-36.
  • 9Boulouta I. Hidden connections: The link between board gen der diversity and corporate social performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 113(2) : 185-197.
  • 10Carroll A B and Shabana K M. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and prac- rice[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(1) :85-105.

共引文献56

同被引文献152

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部