期刊文献+

宫颈锥切术后病变残留的危险因素分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨分析宫颈锥切术后病变残留的危险因素,指导临床诊疗。方法 100例行宫颈锥切除术、术后再次行子宫切除术患者,对比不同年龄、绝经状态、病变级别、切缘状态、锥切手术史患者术后病变残留发生情况,分析患者宫颈锥切术后病变残留的危险因素。结果年龄>40岁患者术后病变残留发生率57.14%高于年龄≤40岁患者的18.06%,已经绝经患者术后病变残留发生率64.00%高于未绝经患者的17.33%,微小浸润癌患者术后病变残留发生率62.50%高于宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者的18.42%,手术切缘阳性患者术后病变残留发生率53.13%高于手术切缘阴性患者的17.65%,有锥切手术史患者术后病变残留发生率75.00%高于无锥切手术史患者的20.24%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微小浸润癌、手术切缘阳性、年龄>40岁、绝经、有锥切手术史患者宫颈锥切术后病变风险高,应加强对此类患者的管理,密切随访,以便早期发现残留病变并及时予以处理。
作者 尚红娇
出处 《中国实用医药》 2020年第15期70-71,共2页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1杨慧娟,张玉勤,唐美琴,江榕,李子庭.应用普通电刀的宫颈锥切术诊治宫颈上皮内瘤变和微小浸润癌的临床观察[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(11):922-925. 被引量:21
  • 2Kocken M,Helmerho~t TJ,Berkhof J,et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment:a long-termmulti-cohort study[J]. Lancet Oncol,2011,12(5) :441 -450.
  • 3Malapati R, Chaparala S, Cejtin HE. Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgi- cal excision procedure[J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2011,15 ( 3 ) : 177 -179.
  • 4Tome A, Fuste P, Rodriguez-Carunehio L, et al. Intraoperative post-coni- sation hun*an papillomavims testing for early detection of treatment failure in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a pilot study [ J ]. BJOG:An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,2013,120 (4) :392 -399.
  • 5Van Hamont D, Van Ham MAPC, Struik-van der Zanden PHTH, et al. Long-term follow-up after large-loop excision of the transformation zone:evaluation of 22 years treatment of high-grade cervical intraepi- thelial neoplasia[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16 ( 2 ) : 615 - 619.
  • 6Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et at. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors [ J ]. J Low Genit Tract Dis,2013,17 ( 1 ) : sl - s27.
  • 7Gosvig CF, Huusom LD, Dehour I, et al. Role of human papillomavirus testing and cytology in follow-up after conization[ J]. Acta Obstet Gy- necol Scand ,2015,94 (4) :405 - 411.
  • 8Thompson V, Marin R. Is colposcopy necessary at twelve months after large loop excision of the transformation zone7 A clinical audit [ J ]. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013,53(6) :571 -573.
  • 9Shaco-Levy R, Meirovitz M, Eger G, et al. Post-conization endocervicM curettage for estimating the risk of persistent or recurrent high-grade dysplasia[ J ]. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 2013,121(1) :49 -52.
  • 10Zhang L, Li Q, Zhao M, et al. Discrepancies between biopsy-based and excision-based grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia : The impor- tant role of time between excision and biopsy [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Pathol,2015,34(3) :221 -227.

共引文献60

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部