期刊文献+

企业员工资质过剩感对工作投入的影响研究——基于工作成就感和公平敏感性的作用机制 被引量:5

Research on the Influence of Overqualification on Work Engagement--Based on the Mechanisms of Job Satisfaction and Equity Sensitivity
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业员工的资质过剩感对工作投入存在显著消极影响,导致组织效率降低。研究发现,工作成就感在资质过剩感与工作投入之间起中介作用,当员工存在较高的工作成就感时,可以降低资质过剩感;公平敏感性在资质过剩感与工作投入之间也具有调节作用,即员工的公平敏感性越强,资质过剩感对工作投入的消极影响越强。企业管理者对资质过剩感员工应通过提升其工作自主性、适度赋权、给予激励等方式增加其工作成就感,同时正确引导员工的公平敏感性倾向,减少消极行为。将员工报酬、绩效激励和业绩目标充分联系起来,调动资质过剩感员工的创造性,最终实现企业内部的绩效优化。 Employees’perception of overqualification plays a negative effect on work engagement,which will result in reduction of organizational efficiency.The research reveals that job satisfaction plays a mediating effect between the perception of overqualification and work engagement since employees will decrease the perception of overqualification when they own higher job satisfaction.What’s more,the equity sensitivity also plays a regulating effect between overqualification and work engagement.The stronger the employees’equity sensitivity is,the more negative effects of overqualification plays on the work engagement.In order to motivate employees’creativity and finally realize the internal performance,it is necessary for enterprises to fully combine the employees’compensation,performance incentives and objectives together.
作者 赵恒春 彭青 ZHAO Heng-chun;PENG Qing
出处 《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期67-72,127,共7页 Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3653
  • 2龙立荣,方俐洛,凌文辁.企业员工自我职业生涯管理的结构及关系[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):183-191. 被引量:94
  • 3骆方,张厚粲.使用验证性因素分析检验测验的多维性的实验研究[J].统计研究,2006,23(4):76-79. 被引量:13
  • 4Colquitt, J A & Conlon D E, Wesson M J, Porter C O &Ng K. 2001. “Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research,” Journal of Applied Psychology 86.
  • 5Leventhal, G S, & Karuza J, Fry W R. 1980. “Beyond fairness:A theory of allocation preferences,” In: G Mikula ed. Justice and social interaction. NY.. Springer-Verlag.
  • 6Bies, R J, & Moag J F. 1986. “Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness,”In: Lewicki R J, Sheppard B H, Bazerman M H ed. Research on negotiations in organizations 1. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  • 7Colquitt, J A. 2001.“On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure,”Journal of Applied Psychology 86.
  • 8Huseman, R C, Hatfield J D, Miles E W. 1987.“A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct,”Academy of Management Review 12.
  • 9King, W C, Mile E W, Day D D. 1993. "A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct," Journal of Organizational Behavior 14.
  • 10Allen, R S, White C S. 2002. “Equity sensitivity theory: a test of responses to two types of under-reward situations,”Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (4).

共引文献4383

同被引文献97

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部