期刊文献+

《腹部放射学会和欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会关于胎盘植入性疾病MRI检查的联合共识声明》要点解读 被引量:23

Interpretation of Society of Abdominal Radiology and European Society of Urogenital Radiology Joint Consensus Statement for MR Imaging of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders
原文传递
导出
摘要 2020年2月,由加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)放射科医师牵头,联合欧洲放射学会(ESR),在《欧洲放射学杂志》(European Radiology)在线刊出腹部放射学会(SAR)和欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会(ESUR)发布的《SAR和ESUR关于PAS的MRI检查的联合共识声明》(SAR and ESUR Joint Consensus Statement for MR Imaging of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders)。该共识声明做出以下推荐,①使用规范化MRI技术方案,获取PAS影像学图像;②使用7项标准化专业术语判读PAS的MRI特点,并出具结构化诊断报告,包括胎盘内T2低信号带、胎盘/子宫膨出、胎盘后T2低信号线消失、子宫肌层变薄/中断、膀胱壁中断、胎盘局部外生团块和胎盘床异生血管。目前,我国孕妇的PAS发病率较高,三级医疗机构及绝大多数县级医疗机构,均配置MRI设备,但是对胎盘MRI影像学诊断的临床研究和应用迄今尚不规范,不能满足临床实践需求。笔者拟结合我国孕妇的PAS影像学诊断的临床实践,对《SAR和ESUR关于PAS的MRI检查的联合共识声明》要点进行解读,旨在为PAS的MRI临床诊断实践提供借鉴,便于达成多学科共识,规范PAS孕妇的围术期管理。产前根据胎盘侵犯的MRI诊断标准,相对准确鉴别诊断PAS类型,可为患者制定个体化的多学科诊治方案,避免术中意外事件发生,从而达到改善母儿结局的目的。 In February 2020,Society of Abdominal Radiology(SAR)and European Society of Urogenital Radiology(ESUR)Joint Consensus Statement for MR Imaging of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders(PAS)which was led by radiologists at the University of California,San Francisco(UCSF),and in conjunction with the European Society of Radiology(ESR)was published online in journal of European Radiology.The consensus statement recommends use of standardized MRI technology to obtain PAS images;meanwhile,it is recommended to use 7 pieces of standardized technical terms to interpret MRI characteristics of PAS and issue a structured diagnostic report,including intraplacental dark T2 bands,placental/uterine bulge,loss of low T2 retroplacental line,myometrial thinning/disruption,bladder wall interruption,focal exophytic placental mass and abnormal vascularization of placental bed.At present,the incidence of PAS is high in China.The tertiary medical institutions and the vast majority of county-level medical institutions are equipped with MRI equipment.However,the clinical research and application of placental imaging diagnosis have not been standardized so far and cannot meet needs of clinical practice in China.The authors intend to interpret the main points of the SAR and ESUR joint consensus statement on MRI of PAS,in conjunction with the clinical practice of imaging diagnosis of PAS in China,and aim to provide a reference for MRI practice of PAS,so as to reach a multidisciplinary consensus and regulate perioperative management of PAS,relatively accurate identification of PAS types before birth by MRI criteria for placental invasion,formulate individualized multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment plan for patients,try to avoid intraoperative accidents,and improve maternal and fetal outcomes.
作者 王霞 赵福敏 李雅倩 宁刚 王晓东 Wang Xia;Zhao Fumin;Li Yaqian;Ning Gang;Wang Xiaodong(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children(Sichuan University),Ministry of Education,West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,Sichuan Province,China;Department of Radiology,Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children(Sichuan University),Ministry of Education,West China Second University Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,Sichuan Province,China)
出处 《中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2020年第2期161-170,共10页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition)
基金 四川省科技计划重点研发项目(2018SZ0265)。
关键词 胎盘植入性疾病 磁共振成像 围术期管理 共识 孕妇 Placenta accrete spectrum disorders Magnetic resonance imaging Perioperative management Consensus Pregnant women
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

  • 1周莉,吴连方.40例植入性胎盘的回顾性分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2005,26(1):90-92. 被引量:47
  • 2王辉,张建华,吴味辛.植入性胎盘23例临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(2):93-95. 被引量:65
  • 3Bretelle F, Courbiere B, Mazouni C, et al. Management of placenta accrete: morbidity and outcome [ J]. Eurp J Obstet Gynecol, 2007,133(1) : 34- 39.
  • 4Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasottliotis SJ, et al.Placenta accrete- summary of 10 years:a survey of 310 cases [J].Placen, 2002,28(2):210- 214.
  • 5Sumigama S, hakura A, Ota T, et al.Placenta previa increta/percreta in Japan: aretrospective study of ultrasound findings, management and clinical course [J] .J Obstet Gynecol Res ,2007,33(5) :606 - 611.
  • 6Yang M J,Wang PH. Peripartum hysterectomy risk factors in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2010; 73:399-400.
  • 7Park EH,Sachs BP. Postpartum haemorrhage and other problems of third stage. In:James DK,Steer PJ,Weiner CP,Gonik B,eds. High Risk Pregnancy-Management Options,2nd ed. Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders; 1999:1231-1246.
  • 8Yucel O,Ozdemir I,Yucel N,Somunkiran A. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy:a 9 year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274:84-87.
  • 9Chestnut DH,Eden,RD,Gall SA,Parker RT. Peripartum hysterectomy:a review of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65:365-370.
  • 10Bai SW,Lee HJ,Cho JS,Park YW,Kim SK,Park KH. Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors. J Reprod Med 2003; 48:148-152.

共引文献114

同被引文献99

引证文献23

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部