期刊文献+

居家脑卒中患者照顾者营养素养测评量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:15

Construction and validation of the Nutrition Literacy Scale for Caregivers of Home-residing Stroke Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制居家脑卒中患者照顾者营养素养测评量表并检验其信效度,为照顾者营养素养评估提供参考。方法经过文献回顾、质性访谈和专家咨询等方法编制该自评式量表,对306名居家卒中照顾者进行调查,检验量表的信效度。结果量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.900,条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.800~1.000。探索性因子分析提取认知态度、知识掌握、技能操作和信息互动评判4个因子,共解释总变异量的56.492%。各维度得分之间及与量表总分呈正相关(均P<0.01)。量表整体Cronbach′sα系数为0.940,各维度Cronbach′sα系数0.828~0.929;折半信度为0.767,重测信度0.920,各维度重测信度0.768~0.910。最终量表共包含4个维度、36个条目。结论居家脑卒中患者照顾者营养素养测评量表信效度良好,可以用于测评居家脑卒中患者照顾者的营养素养水平。 Objective To compile the Nutrition Literacy Scale for Caregivers of Home-residing Stroke Patients and test its reliability and validity,and to provide reference for caregiver nutrition literacy assessment.Methods Based on literature review,qualitative interviews,expert consultation,etc.,the Nutrition Literacy Scale for Caregivers of Home-residing Stroke Patients was drafted and used to measure 306 caregivers of home-residing stroke patients for evaluation of its reliability and validity.Results The scale-level content validity index of the scale was 0.900,and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.800 to 1.000.Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors,including cognitive attitude,knowledge mastery,skills,and information interaction and judgment,all explaining 56.492%of the total variation.There was a positive correlation between either pair of dimension scores,and between each dimension score and the total score of the scale(P<0.01 for all).The overall Cronbach′sαof the scale was 0.940,and the Cronbach′sαof each dimension was 0.828-0.929.The half-reliability was 0.767,the retest reliability was 0.920,and the retest reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.768 to 0.910.The final scale consists of 4 dimensions and 36 items.Conclusion The Nutrition Literacy Scale for Caregivers of Home-residing Stroke Patients enjoys good reliability and validity,and it can be used to assess the nutritional literacy level of caregivers of home residing stroke patients.
作者 齐琲 张振香 杨培琰 符博 郭璐璐 葛爽 Qi Bei;Zhang Zhen-xiang;Yang Peiyan;Fu Bo;Guo Lulu;Ge Shuang(School of Nursing and Health,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第8期90-94,共5页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(SBGJ2018052) 河南省社会科学界联合会资助项目(SKL-2019-565) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(2018-ZZJH-547)。
关键词 脑卒中 照顾者 居家 营养素养 认知 知识 技能 信息互动 信度 效度 stroke caregiver home residing nutrition literacy cognition knowledge skills information interaction reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1陈红宇,倪利蓉,刘桃英,金丽梅.医院健康教育管理体系的建立与实施[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(12):920-922. 被引量:123
  • 2李小妹.护理学导论[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:164.
  • 3Pirna K,Rahu K,Barengo N C, et al. Comparison of know ledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking among Es tonian and Finnish physicians[J]. Soz Praventivmed, 2005, 50(6) ..378-388.
  • 4佚名.新的医学模式[DB/OL].(2004-02-28)[2014-06-08]. http://www, bioon, corn/Article/Class309/5851. shtml.
  • 5Cleary A, Dowling M. Knowledge and attitudes of mental health professionals in Ireland to the concept of recovery in mental health: a questionnaire survey[J]. J Psychiatr Ment Healih Nurs,2009,16(2) :539-545.
  • 6Baker G R,Norton P G,Flintoft V,et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events a- mong hospital patients in Canada[J ]. CMAJ, 2004,170 (11) :1678-1686.
  • 7Woods D, Thomas E, Holl J, et al. Adverse events and preventable adverse events in children[J]. Pediatrics, 2005,115(1) : 155-160.
  • 8Firth-Cozens J. Barriers to incident reporting[J]. Qual Saf Health Care,2002,11(1) :7.
  • 9Kingstone M J, Evans S M, Smith B J, et al. Attitudes of doctors and nurse towards incident reporting..a qualita- tive analysis[J]. Med J Aust,2004,18(1):36-39.
  • 10Waring J J. Beyond blame., cultural barriers to medical in- cident reporting [J]. Soc Sci Med, 2005, 60 (9) .. 1927- 1935.

共引文献423

同被引文献144

引证文献15

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部