期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁透明度问题研究 被引量:3

Research on Transparency of International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,投资者与国家间基于条约的仲裁案件不断增多,但是由于现行的投资仲裁机制对于公共利益的忽视,使国际投资仲裁这一争议解决方式广受诟病,从而引发了"国际投资仲裁正当性危机"。为了应对这种"危机",国际社会进行投资仲裁透明度改革的呼声越来越高,本文将在对国际投资仲裁透明度问题的现状进行分析的前提下,对国际投资仲裁透明度问题的解决路径,即国际投资条约、投资仲裁规则以及国际公约三种方式进行阐述,并针对我国的现状提出相关建议。 In recent years,the number of treaty-based arbitration cases between investors and countries has been increasing.However,due to the neglect of public interest in the current investment arbitration mechanism,this dispute settlement method has been widely criticized,which has triggered the"legitimacy crisis of international investment arbitration".In order to cope with this"crisis",international community calls for transparency reform in international investment arbitration.On the premise of analyzing the current situation of the transparency of international investment arbitration,this paper will discuss the three ways to achieve the transparency of international investment arbitration,namely,international investment treaties,investment arbitration rules and international convention and put forward relevant suggestions according to China’s current situation.
作者 吴辉 Wu Hui
出处 《北京仲裁》 2019年第4期231-254,共24页 Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词 国际投资仲裁 透明度 公共利益 international investment arbitration transparency public interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1Santa Elena v. Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, Metalclad v. Mexican , ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 , Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, para. 148.
  • 2Stuart G. Gross, Note, Inordinate Chill: BITs, Non - NAFTA MITs, and Host - State Regulatory Freedom - An Indonesian Case Study, 24 MICH. J. INT' L L.
  • 3Etlvyl V. Canada [ EB/OL]. http: //www. dfait -maeci. go. ca/disp/ethyl_archive, asp, Dec. 10, 2009.
  • 4http ://ita. law. uvic. ca/investmenttreaties, htm.
  • 5Tecmed v. Mexico, 43 ILM 133(2004), paras. 122 - 149.
  • 6Methanex Corp. v. United States, Final Award, 1CSID ( World Bank) (2005).
  • 7Susan D. Franck, The Liability of International Arbitrators : A Comparative Analysis and Proposal for Qualified Immunity, 20 N.Y. L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. ,2000.
  • 8Zachary M. Eastman, NAFTA' s Chapter 11 : For Whose Benefit? Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 16, 1999.
  • 9ICSID, Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration, para. 4 and its Annex, ( 2006 - 1 - 10 ) [ EB/OL http: !/www. worldbank, org/icsid/highlights/DiscussionPaper, pdf.
  • 10Howard Mann, International Investment Agreements, Business and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities, IISD Publications Centre , 2008.

共引文献24

同被引文献28

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部