论技术市场反垄断规制的独立化

Independence of Anti-Monopoly Regulation in Technology Market

对如何有效化解知识产权反垄断领域因技术因素日益增多而导致的规制不足这一困局,学界和实务界均未给予足够回应。目前司法实践通常将技术单纯当作界定"相关市场"的因素之一对待,但这一做法并未使问题得以有效解决。无论着眼于知识产权反垄断规制的现实需要,还是技术市场自身的特性,赋予技术市场以独立的规制地位已迫在眉睫。在此语境下,技术市场内部所含地域、时间等相关因素才会清晰完整地呈现出来。在相关市场界定方面,应当防范传统商品市场的原则和方法片面地主宰技术市场。具体而言,对技术市场的界定首先应当突出其独特性,并在遵循相关市场界定一般性原则的前提下,将竞争损害原则、行为主义标准和利益平衡理论吸收和应用于个案分析。

The academic and practical circles have not responded adequately to the problem of insufficient anti-monopoly regulation in the field of intellectual property resulted from the increasing number of technical factors. Current judicial practice often treats technology simply as one of factors to define the"relevant market", which works ineffectively to solve the problem. Given the practical need of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property and characteristics of the technology market, it is urgent to endow the technology market with an independent regulatory status, In this context, the region, time and other related factors within the technology market will be clearly and completely presented. In terms of defining relevant market,attention should be paid to prevent principles and methods of traditional commodity market from being dominated by the technology market. To be specific, the definition of technology market should first highlight its uniqueness, and on the premise of following the general principle of relevant market definition, the competition and damage compensation principle, behaviorist standards and the theory of interest balance should be adopted and applied to case study.