期刊文献+

内镜下黏膜切除术与传统息肉切除术治疗大肠息肉的疗效评价 被引量:2

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Traditional Polypectomy for the Treatment of Colorectal Polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与传统息肉切除术治疗大肠息肉的疗效。方法:选取2017年4月~2018年5月入住本院的200例的大肠息肉患者,将其按照抽签法随机分为甲组和乙组,每组各100例,甲组进行传统息肉切除术治疗,乙组进行EMR治疗,对比两组患者治疗效果以及一次切除率、出血率等指标。结果:通过对比两组患者治疗效果以及一次切除率、出血率等指标,发现乙组的各项数据均优于甲组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:对比传统内镜下息肉切除术,EMR治疗大肠息肉不仅具有更高的安全性和治疗效果,还可以减轻患者的痛苦。 Objective:To explore the efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and traditional polypectomy for large intestine polyps.Methods:200 patients with colorectal polyps who were admitted to our hospital from April 2017 to May 2018 were randomly divided into groups A and B according to the lottery method.Each group had 100 patients.Group A underwent traditional polypectomy For treatment,group B was treated with EMR,comparing the treatment effect of the two groups of patients with the indexes of one-time resection rate and bleeding rate.Results:By comparing the treatment effect,primary resection rate,bleeding rate and other indicators of the two groups of patients,it was found that the data of group B were better than group A,P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion:Compared with traditional endoscopic polypectomy,EMR treatment of colorectal polyps not only has higher safety and therapeutic effect,but also can alleviate the pain of patients,it is worthy of clinical use.
作者 袁梅婧 YUAN Mei-jing(Department of Gastroenterology,Shenyang Fifth People’s Hospital,Liaoning Shenyang 110023)
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2020年第10期79-80,共2页 China Medical Device Information
关键词 内镜 黏膜切除术 息肉切除术 大肠息肉 endoscopy mucosal resection polypectomy large intestine polyp
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

共引文献17

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部