期刊文献+

客观与主观情绪标签的差异:来自ERP的证据 被引量:1

Differences between Objective Affect Labeling and Subjective Affect Labeling:Evidence from EPR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用事件相关电位技术,选择34名大学生被试,比较了客观情绪标签、主观情绪标签以及观看间的时间进程差异。结果发现:客观情绪标签下,LPP波幅在500-550ms和550-600ms两个时间窗口内均大于观看;主观情绪标签下LPP波幅与观看没有显著差异;在P3波幅上,客观情绪标签大于主观情绪标签。这提示,客观情绪标签与主观情绪标签可能在情绪评价上存在差异,进而呈现出不一样的情绪调节效果。 With the technology of ERP(event-related potential),34 college students were selected to participate in the research,which aims to distinguish the time course differences between objective affect labeling,subjective affect labeling and observing.The results show that:firstly,the LPP amplitude of objective affect labeling is larger than that of observing during the two time windows of 500-550ms and 550-600ms;secondly,there is no significant difference of LPP amplitude between the subjective affect labeling and observing;thirdly,the P3 amplitude of objective affect labeling is larger than that of subjective affect labeling.This suggests that objective affect labeling and subjective affect labeling may have differences in emotion evaluation,thus exerting different emotion regulation effects.
作者 邓欢 李振兴 DENG Huan;LI Zhenxing(School of Education,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei,Anhui,235000,China)
出处 《江苏第二师范学院学报》 2020年第2期49-53,80,124,共7页 Journal of Jiangsu Second Normal University
基金 安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“特殊儿童家长的羞耻情绪及干预策略研究”(项目编号:AHSKQ2019D034) 安徽省高校人文社科研究重点项目“留守儿童的羞耻情绪及干预策略研究”(项目编号:SK2019A0389) 中国人民大学中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金“内疚与羞愧的产生机制:自我建构的视角”(项目编号:RUCPSY0018)。
关键词 客观情绪标签 主观情绪标签 事件相关电位 objective affect labeling subjective affect labeling ERP
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):719-722. 被引量:310
  • 2王妍,罗跃嘉.大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(4):396-398. 被引量:181
  • 3Lieberman MD,Inagaki TK,Tabibnia G,et al.Subjective responses to emotional stimuli during labeling,reappraisal,and distraction[J].Emotion,2011,11 (3):468-480.
  • 4Creswell JD,Way BM,Eisenberger NI,et al.Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling[J].Psychosomat Med,2007,69(6):560-565.
  • 5Lieberman MD,Eisenberger NI,Crockett MJ,et al.Putting feelings into words affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli[J].Psychol Sci,2007,18 (5):421-428.
  • 6Lieberman MD,Todorov A,Fiske S,et al.Why symbolic processing of affect can disrupt negative affect:social cognitive and affective neuroscience investigations[M]//Todorow A,Fiske S,Prentice D,eds.Social neuroscience:toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2011:188-209.
  • 7Berkman ET,Lieberman MD.Using neuroscience to broaden emotion regulation:theoretical and methodological considerations[J].Soc Pers Psychol Compass,2009,3(4):475-493.
  • 8Hajcak G,Moser JS,Simons RF.Attending to affect:appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures[J].Emotion,2006,6(3):517-522.
  • 9Hajcak G,MacNamara A,Foti D,et al.The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion:simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials[J].Biol Psychol,2013,92(3):447-455.
  • 10Utama NP,Takemoto A,Koike Y,et al.Phased processing of facial emotion:an ERP study[J].Neurosci Res,2009,64(1):30-40.

共引文献26

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部