期刊文献+

不同加工方式对花生致敏性的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Different Processing Methods on the Allergenicity of Peanut
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,食物过敏成为很严重的食品安全问题,花生作为八大致敏原之一,其致敏性具有严重性、高发性等特点,通常难以治愈且伴随终生。现已发现花生含有16种致敏蛋白,分别为Ara h 1~Ara h 17。不同的加工方式对花生蛋白的结构与功能产生不同的影响,引起花生致敏性发生一定的改变。通过结合已有的花生致敏性的研究成果,综合评估细胞模型和评估动物模型2种常用花生致敏评价模型,分析传统热处理如热风干燥、煎炸、烘烤、水煮和新型非热处理如酶解、辐照、高压微射流等处理对花生致敏性的影响,为降低花生制品的致敏性提供理论依据。 In recent years,food allergies have become a serious food safety issue.As one of the eight major allergens,peanut has the characteristics of seriousness and high sensitization,which is often difficult to cure and is associated with life.It has been found that peanuts contain sixteen allergenic proteins,namely Ara h 1~Ara h 17.Different processing methods have different influences on the structure and function of peanut protein,which further affect the allergenicity of peanut.In this paper,according to the researches and our previous works,we comprehensively evaluated two peanut allergy evaluation models,cell model and animal model.The effects of different treatment modes such as conventional heat treatment and novel non-heat treatment on peanut allergenicity were investigated.This review provide a theoretical basis for the development of hypoallergenic foods.
作者 王烁 孙晓东 钮冰 陈沁 WANG Shuo;SUN Xiaodong;NIU Bing;CHEN Qin(College of Life Sciences,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
出处 《食品科技》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第4期49-55,共7页 Food Science and Technology
关键词 花生过敏 致敏蛋白 评价模型 热处理 非热处理 peanut allergy sensitizing protein evaluation model heat treatment non-heat treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1吕相征,刘秀梅,郭云昌,杨晓光.BALB/c小鼠食物过敏动物模型的实验研究[J].卫生研究,2005,34(2):211-213. 被引量:15
  • 2BROSTOFF J. Food allergy and intolerance[ J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 1991, 21 (Suppl 1): 325-329.
  • 3HILTON J, DEARMAN R J, BASKETTER D A, et al. Serological responses induced in mice by immunogenic proteins and by protein respiratory allergens [ J]. Toxicol Lett, 1994, 73 ( 1 ) : 43-53.
  • 4PRESCOTT V E,HOGAN S P. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment [ J ]. Pharmacol Ther, 2006, 111 (2) : 374-383.
  • 5POLTORAK A, HE X, SMIRNOVA I, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene [J]. Science, 1998, 282(5396): 2085-2088.
  • 6BASHIR M E, LOUIE S, SHI H N, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling by intestinal microbes influences susceptibility to food allergy [ J ]. J Immunol, 2004, 172 ( 11 ) : 6978-6987.
  • 7CAPOBIANCO F, BUTTERONI C, BARLETTA B, et al. Oral sensitization with shrimp tropomyosin induces in mice allergen-specific IgE, T cell response and systemic anaphylactic reactions [ J ]. Int Immunol, 2008, 20(8): 1077-1086.
  • 8KIMBER I, DEARMAN R J. Food allergy: what are the issues[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2001, 120 ( 1-3 ) : 165-170.
  • 9DEARMAN R J, CADDICK H, STONE S, et al. Characterization of antibody responses induced in rodents by exposure to food proteins: influence of route of exposure[ J]. Toxicology, 2001, 167 (3) : 217.
  • 10DEARMAN R J, KIMBER I. Determination of protein allergenicity: studies in mice[ J]. Toxicol Lett, 2001, 120(1-3) : 181-186.

共引文献22

同被引文献60

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部