期刊文献+

日本国家高等教育改革、支援和学位授予局评估标准调整探析 被引量:1

Adjustment of Evaluation Criteria of National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Japan’s Higher Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国家高等教育改革、支援和学位授予局是日本文部科学省认可具备认证资质的三大质量保障机构之一,其三轮评估在标准的方面都有所差异。通过分析该机构三轮评估中评估标准及实施方式的调整过程,总结和提炼其这些"标准"在方向和内容上调整的特点,以期镜鉴和启示我国高校评估的未来发展。 The National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education is one of the three major quality assurance institutions recognized by the Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology in Japan, and its evaluations are different in terms of standards since the three rounds. By analyzing the adjustment process of the evaluation standards and implementation methods in the three rounds of evaluation, this paper summarizes and refines the characteristics of the adjustment of these "standards" regarding to the directions and contents, so as to mirror and enlighten future development of the evaluation of colleges and universities in China.
作者 杨秀柱 刘芳 YANG Xiu-zhu;LIU Fang(Guizhou Academy of Education,Guiyang 550081,China;Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210024,China)
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 北大核心 2020年第5期73-78,共6页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
关键词 日本 高校评估 国家高等教育改革、支援和学位授予局 标准 Japan university and college evaluation National Institution for Academic Degrees and Quality Enhancement of Higher Education standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1王祥.强调多元的高等教育认可标准修订——以美国“北部中央院校协会”的做法为例[J].教育学术月刊,2013(8):74-77. 被引量:2
  • 2李含劼.稷下学宫的办学特点及其启示[J].高等教育研究,1988,9(4):105-109. 被引量:6
  • 3华国栋,高宝立.实施优质教育,促进全体学生全面发展——江苏省泰兴市洋思中学的经验及启示[J].教育研究,2005,26(6):68-73. 被引量:21
  • 4天野郁夫,陈武元.日本的大学评价[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(21):60-64. 被引量:12
  • 5Tam, W. M. , &Cheng, Y. C. The management of education quality: Comparison of competing perspectives [ J ]. Education Journal,2001, ( 1 ) :158 - 169.
  • 6Mok, M. M. C. , Gurr, D. , Izawa, E. , Knipprath, H. , Lee, I. H. , Mel, M. A. , Palmer, T. Shan, W. J. , &Zhang, Y. Quality assurance and school monitoring[ C]//In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe, International handbook of educational research in the Asia - Pacific region. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education : Volume 11. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers,2003.
  • 7Australian Qualifications Framework. Self - accrediting higher education institutions [ EB/OL ]. http://www, aqf. edu. au/ RegisterAccreditation/Accreditation/SelfaccreditingHigherEd- ucationinstitutions/tabid/170/Defauh, aspx,2013 - 02 - 16.
  • 8The new criteria for accreditation[ EB/OL]. http://www. ncahtc, org/Information - for - Institutions/new - criteria - for - accreditation, html,2012 - 06 - 01.
  • 9Wong, W. S. Different approaches to QA in Hong Kong, Ma- inland China and Taiwan : Background, impact, and reactions from the sector[ EB/OL]. New approaches to quality assur- ance in the changing world of higher education, paper presen- ted at INQAAHE conference, 2009, United Arab Emirates. http ://www. inqaahe, org/admin/files/assets/subsites/1/ documenterr/1241709496_w, s. wong - different - approaches - to - hong - kongmainland - china - and - taiwan, pdf, 2012 - 11 - 11.
  • 10Eaton, J. S. The future of accreditation [ EB/OL ]. http:// www. insidehighered, com/views/2008/03/24/eaton. 2012 - 04 -12.

共引文献49

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部