期刊文献+

试论美国制宪奇迹话语之构建

On the Constructing of Miracle Discourse of the U.S.Constitution-Making
原文传递
导出
摘要 中美两国很多学者将1787年美国制宪视为一种"奇迹"。最近几年,美国制宪"奇迹"话语再次升温。不过,很多因袭此种"奇迹"话语的(中国)学者和读者,并没有留意到话语背后的浓烈宗教色彩和强烈现实需要。美国制宪"奇迹"话语的首创者正是当年参与制宪活动的几位重要人物,他们希望利用"奇迹"话语策略,促使各州尽快批准新宪法。在此基础之上,美国人采取四种常用手法--神化制宪参与者,夸大制宪会议分歧,夸赞宪法设计完美巧妙、值得崇拜,认定宪法契合美国民族性格、能够长久存续,十分巧妙地构建出美国制宪"奇迹"话语。但若详加剖析,即可发现上述四种手法均有不甚圆满之处,制宪"奇迹"话语可谓一种神话。我们应在洞悉美国制宪"奇迹"话语构建手法的基础之上,批判地理解美国制宪的历史过程和时代意义。 The making of the U.S.Constitution in 1787 was viewed by many scholars as a miracle.The publication of the Chinese version of Catherine Drinker Bowen’s Miracle At Philadelphia spurred the miracle discourse in China.The miracle discourse in the U.S.Constitution-making was initiated by the Founding Fathers who used the miracle discourse as a debate tactics to prompt the new Constitution during the ratification period.The Americans invented four kinds of approaches-deify the Framers,amplify the diversity and conflict in the 1787 Convention,prettify the text of the Constitution to cultivate constitutional faith or worship,praise the agreement between the character of the U.S.nationhood and the Constitution to justify the everlasting of the Constitution-to construct the miracle discourse of the U.S.constitution making.As a Chinese scholar,we should pay attention to such kinds of approaches at one hand,on the other hand,perhaps we can learn to use these approaches to construct our own miracle discourse.
作者 胡晓进 Hu Xiaojin
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期72-81,共10页 Journal of Historical Science
基金 中国政法大学科研创新项目(19ZFQ77002) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目。
关键词 “费城奇迹” 美国宪法 话语构建 宪法信仰 Miracle At Philadelphia The U.S.Constitution Discourse Construction Constitutional Faith
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献82

  • 1伯纳德·贝林.《美国革命的思想意识渊源》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007年,第289页.
  • 2Charles R. Irish, " Reflections on the Evolution of Law and Legal Education in China and Vietnam," Wisconsin International Law Journal, 25 (2), 2007:243 - 254.
  • 3Qingjiang Kong, "Practice in Legal Education : International Experience and Chinese Response," Pacific McGeorge Global Business and Development Law Journal, 22, 2009:35 -44.
  • 4Shiwen Zhou, "The Reform Strategy of Legal Education in China," Pacific McGeorge Global Business and Development Law Journal, 22, 2009, 69 - 74.
  • 5Clyde W. Barrow, "Historical Criticism of the US Constitution in Populist-Progressive Political Theory," History of Political Thought, 9 ( 1 ), 1988:111 - 128.
  • 6Herman Belz, A Living Constitution or Fundamental Law?: American Constitutionalism in Historical Perspective (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Inc. , 1998).
  • 7Richard Bernstein, "Charting the Bicentennial," Columbia Law Review, 87, (Summer) 1987 : 1565 - 1624.
  • 8Saul Comell, "Liberal Republicans, Republican Liberals?: The Political Thought of the Founders Reconsidered," Reviews in American History, 21, (March) 1993 : 26 - 30.
  • 9Alan Gibson, Interpreting the Founding: Guide to the Enduring Debates over the Origins And Foundations of the American Republic ( Lawrence : University Press of Kansas, 2006).
  • 10Gibson, Understanding the Founding: The Crucial Questions ( Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2010).

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部