摘要
对于已经通过环境影响评价文件批准的建设项目,如果在建设、运行过程中发生变动,需要开展环境影响后评价或重新报批环评文件。为了更好地完善此类建设项目的环评机制并强化对关键条款的解读,对比分析了后评价与重新报批制度在环评文件形式、评价目的、适用情形、执行时间点、审批权限、法律效力等方面的存在的差异,梳理了有关法规条文的相容性和互补性。
For the construction projects that have obtained the approval of environmental impact assessment(EIA),it is necessary to carry out environmental impact post-project-assessment(EIPPA)or resubmit the EIA document for approval if any change happens during the construction and operation process.In order to improve the EIA regulations of this kind of construction projects and obtain better understand of key terms,the differences between post-evaluation and re-approval regulations regarding EIA document,evaluation purpose,applicable situations,execution time,approval authority and legal effect were analyzed.In addition,the compatibility and complementarity of relevant policies were summarized.
作者
李道群
LI Daoqun(Jiangsu Guoheng Safety Evaluation&Consulting Service Co.,Ltd.,Nanjing 210019,China)
出处
《能源环境保护》
2020年第3期72-76,共5页
Energy Environmental Protection
关键词
环境影响后评价
重新报批环评文件
差异
Environmental impact post-project-assessment(EIPPA)
Re-submission and approval of EIA documents
Difference