期刊文献+

骶尾部病灶切除敞开创面联合邮票植皮治疗骶尾部藏毛窦30例疗效观察 被引量:3

Sacrococcygeal Lesion Resection&Exposing Wound-surface Combined with Stamp-like Dermatoplasty in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus:Effect Observation on 30 Cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 为观察骶尾部病灶切除敞开创面联合邮票植皮治疗骶尾部藏毛窦患者的疗效,将30例骶尾部藏毛窦患者行骶尾部病灶切除敞开创面联合邮票植皮治疗,对临床治疗效果进行观察与分析。结果显示,本组患者全部治愈。平均手术时间(26.76±3.08)min,平均创面愈合时间(14.98±2.07)d,住院时间12~17d,术后无创口感染者。随访3~10个月,无复发。结果表明,采用骶尾部病灶切除敞开创面联合邮票植皮治疗骶尾部藏毛窦,可有效缓解患者疼痛,具有手术时间短、住院时间短、术后并发症少、复发率低等优点。 This study was to observe the effect of sacrococcygeal lesion resection&exposing wound-surface combined with stamp-like dermatoplasty for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus(SPS),30cases of SPS received above combined procedure;then their effect was observed.As results,the 30cases were cured all,average operating time was(26.76±3.08)min,average wound-surface healing time was(14.98±2.07)days,hospitalization time was(12-17)days;no wound infection occured;the follow-up of 3-10months did not find recurrence cases.Results show that above-mentioned combined procedure for SPS can effectively relieve patients'pain,has such merits as shorter operating time and hospitalization time,less postoperative complication and lower recurrence rate.
作者 何隆甫 向德志 温月花 陈锦珍 HE Long-fu;XIANG De-zhi;WEN Yue-hua;CHEN Jin-zhen(Coloproctological Dept.,No.5 Affiliated Hospital(Zhuhai)to Zunyi Medical University,Zhuhai,Guangdong 519100)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2020年第4期38-39,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 骶尾部藏毛窦 骶尾部病灶切除敞开创面 邮票植皮 Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus Sacrococcygeal lesion resection&exposing wound-surface Stamp-like dermatoplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献79

  • 1高泳涛,黄勇,王香娥,张廷璆.未成熟畸胎瘤25例临床病理分析[J].肿瘤学杂志,2004,10(4):251-253. 被引量:5
  • 2杨新庆,郑毅.尾部藏毛窦的诊断和治疗[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(2):83-84. 被引量:10
  • 3邹爱国,白光辉,方必东,曾庆娟,许崇永.小儿骶尾部畸胎瘤的CT和MRI诊断[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(10):1131-1132. 被引量:10
  • 4李春雨.肛肠病学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013:48-49.
  • 5Bolandparvaz S, Moghadam Dizaj P, Salahi R, et al. Evaluation of the risk factors of pilonidal sinus: a single center experience[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2012, 23:535-537.
  • 6Yoldas T, Karaca C, Unalp O, et al. Recurrent pilonidal sinus: lay open or flap closure, does it differ?[J]. Im Surg, 2013, 98:319-323.
  • 7Onder A, Girgin S, Kapan M, et al. Pilonidal sinus disease: risk fac- tors for postoperative complications and recurrence[J]. Int Surg, 2012, 97:224-229.
  • 8Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures[J]. Arch Surg, 2002, 137:1146-1150.
  • 9Osmanoglu G, Yetisir F. Limberg flap is better for the surgical treat-ment of pilonidal sinus: results of a 767 patients series with an at least five years follow-up period[J]. Chirurgia, 2011,106:491-494.
  • 10Iesalnieks I, Deimel S, Schlitt HJ. Karydakis flap for recurrent pilo- nidal disease[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37:1115-1120.

共引文献30

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部