期刊文献+

肱骨近端双结节锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折 被引量:9

Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with dual-tuberosity locking plate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨肱骨近端双结节锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2017年7月至2019年7月采用肱骨近端双结节锁定钢板治疗19例肱骨近端骨折患者资料,男7例,女12例;年龄(64.0±12.8)岁(范围,32~85岁);依据肱骨近端骨折Neer分型,其中两部分肱骨近端骨折1例,三部分肱骨近端骨折9例,四部分肱骨近端骨折9例;9例大、小结节均骨折,10例仅大结节骨折。记录所有患者末次随访时的Constant-Murley肩关节评分、上肢功能障碍(disability of the arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)评分量表、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、颈干角改变量、肱骨头高度改变量、患肢活动范围、骨折愈合情况以及其他并发症情况。结果术后19例患者均获得随访,随访时间16.1个月(范围,12~18个月)。末次随访时19例患者骨折均已愈合,Constant-Murley肩关节评分为(84.2±11.0)分(范围,55~98分);DASH评分为(19.4±11.6)分(范围,2.3~47.8分);VAS评分为(1.6±1.3)分(范围,0~4分),其中轻微疼痛17例(89.5%,17/19)。19例患者术后第1天颈干角141.9°±9.8°(范围,132.17°~162.66°,肱骨头高度(18.0±5.9)mm(范围,7.45~27.12 mm);末次随访时颈干角148.6°±7.5°(范围,132.70°~159.39°),肱骨头高度(17.4±5.5)mm(范围,5.02~27.31 mm);颈干角改变量为3.29°(范围,0.68°~33.10°),肱骨头高度改变量0.68 mm(范围,1.32~6.56 mm),其中内固定失效4例。术后第1天,1例出现距螺钉穿出,该例患者术后第17天出现伤口感染,予以清创术治疗后感染控制。无一例出现大、小结节吸收或畸形愈合。结论肱骨近端双结节锁定钢板能够同时固定大、小结节骨折块,维持结节骨折块与肱骨干之间的相对位置,减少术后结节再移位或畸形愈合,术后疗效满意。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of dual-tuberosity locking plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.Methods This study retrospectively analyzed data of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with a new locking plate from July 2017 to July 2019.Finally,19 eligible patients were included,including 12 females and 7 males,with an average age of 64.0±12.8 years(range,32-85 years).According to the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures,1 case was two-part fractures,9 cases three-part fractures and 9 cases four-part fractures.Among them,9 cases combined with greater and lesser tuberosities fractures and 10 cases with isolated greater tuberosity fractures.Constant-Murley and disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand(DASH)scores,the change of neck-shaft angle,the change of humeral head height,tuberosity consolidation and other complications were recorded at the latest follow-up.Results The mean follow-up time was 16.1 months(range,12-18 months).All fractures were healed within follow-up period.Mean Constant-Murley score was 84.2±11.0(range,55-98),DASH score was 19.4±11.6(range,2.3-47.8)and VAS was 1.6±1.3(range,0-4)at the latest follow-up.As for the radiographic results,19 patients had a mean neck-stem angle of 141.9°±9.8°(range,132.17°-162.66°)on the first day after surgery,and a mean humeral head height of 18.0±5.9 mm(range,7.45-27.12 mm).The mean neck-stem angle was 148.6°±7.5°(range,132.70°-159.39°)and the mean humeral head height was 17.4±5.5 mm(range,5.02-27.31 mm)at the latest follow-up.The average change of neck-stem angle was 3.29°(range,0.68°-33.10°),and mean change of humeral head height was 0.68 mm(range,1.32-6.56 mm).No fractures developed greater or lesser tuberosity absorption or malunion,but 4 cases suffered loss of fixation and 1 developed primary intra-articular screw penetration as well as wound infection.Conclusion In the open reduction and internal fixation of the proximal humeral fractures,the new locking plate can fix greater and lesser tuberosity fractures simultaneously,which helps reduce their displacement and deformity of tuberosities.By given that,satisfactory radiographic outcomes and shoulder functions can be obtained.
作者 盛宁 褚光宇 石文亭 陈云丰 Sheng Ning;Chu Guangyu;Shi Wenting;Chen Yunfeng(Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital,Shanghai 200233,China)
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期726-733,共8页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新能力三年行动计划项目(16CR3042A)。
关键词 肱骨骨折 骨折固定术 内固定器 Humeral fractures Fracture fixation internal Internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Zuekerman JD, Checroun AJ. Fractures of the humerus: diagnosis and management, In: Iannoti JP, Williams GR Jr. Disorders of the shoulder: diagnosis and mangement. 1st eds. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999. 639-685.
  • 2Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fracture. Part Ⅱ. Treatment of the three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1970, 52: 1090-1103.
  • 3Hawkins RJ, Kiefer GN. Internal fixation techniques for proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop, 1987, (223): 77-85.
  • 4Hawkins R J, Bell RH, Gurr K. The three-part fracture of the proximal of the humerus: operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1986, 68: 1410-1414.
  • 5Kristiansen B, Kofoed H. Transeutaneous reduction and external fixation of displacted fracture of proximal humerus: a contorlled clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1988, 70: 821-824.
  • 6Kristiansen B, Christensen SW. Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Seand, 1986, 57: 320-323.
  • 7Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Pollock RG. Fractures of the proximal huerus. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, et al. Fractuers in adults. 4th eds. Philadephia: Lippincott Raven, 1996. 1055-1107.
  • 8Jaberg H, Warner J J, Jakob RP. Percutaneous stabilization of unstable fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1992, 74:508-515.
  • 9Kocialkowski A, Wallace WA. Closed percutaneous K-wire stabilization for displacted fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus.Injury, 1990, 21: 209-212.
  • 10Resch H, Povacz P, Frohlich R, et al. Percutaneous fixation of the three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1997, 79: 295-300.

共引文献202

同被引文献62

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部