期刊文献+

A Two-Level Hierarchical Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Application to International Climate Change Negotiations 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 A novel two-level hierarchical graph model is developed to analyze international climate change negotiations with hierarchical structures:the negotiations take place between two nations and between each nation and its provincial governments.The two national government are two decision makers at the top level.Within each nation,the two provincial governments negotiate with the national government at the lower level.The theoretical structure of this novel model,including decision makers,options,moves,and preference relations,are developed.The interrelationship between the stabilities in the two-level hierarchical graph model and the stabilities in local models are investigated by theorems.These theorems can be utilized to calculate complete stabilities in the two-level hierarchical graph model when the stabilities in local graph models are known.The international climate change negotiations as the illustrative example is then investigated in detail.The extra equilibrium,uniquely obtained by this novel methodology,suggests that opposition may still be from one provincial government when the national government does not sign the international climate agreement and implements existing environmental laws.Compared with other approaches,this novel methodology is an effective and flexible tool in analyzing hierarchical conflicts at two levels by providing decision makers with strategic resolutions with broader vision.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2020年第3期251-272,共22页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for carefully reading this paper and having provided meaningful suggestions which helped improve the quality of paper.This paper should be dedicated to Dr.Ye Chen who was a coauthor and passed away in June,2019.This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.71601096,China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No.2019M661838,the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities(China)under Grant No.NS2020061,and the Natural Science Young Scholar Foundation of Jiangsu,China,under Grant No.BK20160809.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献75

  • 1Takehiro INOHARA,Keith W. HIPEL,Sean WALKER.CONFLICT ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR INVESTIGATING ATTITUDES AND MISPERCEPTIONS IN THE WAR OF 1812[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2007,16(2):181-201. 被引量:29
  • 2F. S. Hillier and G. J. Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1974.
  • 3M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw Hill, New York, 1982.
  • 4R. E. Steuer, Multiple Criteria Optimization Theory, Computation, and Application, Wiley, New York, 1986.
  • 5A. S. Bryk and S. W. Raudenbush, Hierarchical Linear Models, Sage, London, 1992.
  • 6G. H. Tzeng, H. F. Wang, U. P. Wen, and P. L. Yu, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Springer- Verlag, Amsterdam, 1994.
  • 7Y. Bar-Yam, Dynamics of Complex Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.
  • 8T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  • 9T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994.
  • 10T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.

共引文献40

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部