期刊文献+

太平洋岛屿托管领土的形成与美国的战略意图 被引量:1

The Formation of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands and the American Strategic Intention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 太平洋岛屿作为前日本委任统治地,之所以在二战后成为联合国战略防区托管地,主要是因为美国计划长期占有该地,用作军事基地的建造与使用。关于太平洋岛屿战后处置问题,美国为了满足亚太战略的需求,就内部两派势力的意见进行调和后,在托管统治方案中添加战略防区的概念设计,将该地作为特殊类型的托管领土,使其在托管后依然可以维持自身排他性统治。因此,所谓战略防区托管制度的落地,是美国为太平洋岛屿"量身定制"的一种产物。梳理美国在太平洋岛屿托管领土形成过程中扮演的角色,有助于深化东亚战后秩序重建及其独特性课题的研究探讨,也有利于看清美国近年来试图将战略重心再次转向亚太的历史缘由。 After World War II,the Pacific island trusteeship was designated as a strategic zone trusteeship,which was inseparable from its geopolitical value.An examination of the process by which the site was placed under international trusteeship reveals that the United States intended to occupy and build military bases there for a long time to meet its own strategic planning.To achieve this end,the United States reconciled the disagreements between the two internal forces,and deliberately added the concept of a strategic defense zone to the plan of the international trusteeship system to make the region a special type of trusteeship and achieve the military strategic requirements of exclusive domination.Therefore,the strategic defense zone trusteeship system finally released can be seen as a product tailored by the United States for the Pacific islands.Sorting out and analyzing the process of the formation of the trust territory and the role played by the United States will help explore the formation of the post-war East Asian international order and its unique issues.It is also helpful to understand why the United States has shifted its strategic focus on the Asia-Pacific region in recent years.
作者 李超 Li Chao(Institute of International Studies,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第4期35-44,共10页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“战后琉球法律地位研究”(18CGJ027) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“战后琉球地位的应然与实然”(2018M631986)的阶段性成果。
关键词 太平洋岛屿 托管领土 战略防区托管地 国际托管制度 Pacific islands trust territory strategic defense zone trusteeship international trusteeship
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1David Ryan and Victor Pungong, (eds.). The United States and Decolonization: Power and Freedom [M]. New York: ST.Martin's Press, 2000.
  • 2Alfred Cobban. The Nation State and National Self- Determination [M]. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1962.
  • 3Robert J. McMahon. Colonialism and Cold War: The Unite States and the Struggle for Indonesia Independence, 1945-1949 [M]. New York: Cornell University Press, 1981.
  • 4David Ryan. US Foreign Policy in World History [M]. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  • 5Wm. Roger. Louis. Imperialism at Bay, 1941-1945: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire [M]. Oxford: the Clarendon Press, 1977.
  • 6Christopher Thorne. Allies of a Kind: The United States,Britain and the War Against Japan, 1941-1945 [M]. London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd., 1978.
  • 7Henri Grimal, Translated by Stephan De Vos. Decolonization: The British, French, Dutch and Belgian Empires 1919-1963[M]. Colorado: Westview Press Inc., 1965.
  • 8U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1952-1954, Vol. 3. [Z]. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office (GPO), 1979.
  • 9A. N. Porter and A. J. Stockwell. British Imperial Policy and Decolonization, 1938-64, Vol.1, 1938-51. [M]. London: the Macmillan Press, 1987.
  • 10President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points [Z]. Available at http://avalon, law. yale. edu/20th century/wilson14, asp. 2012-03-02. Samuel I. Rosenman. The public papers and addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt. 1941 volume[M]. New Yor.

共引文献7

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部